Better NFL offense: Patriots or Saints?

saintsfan1976 · 05-29-2012, 08:37 PM

Without reading, i'm saying Saints.

RBs - Saints
WRs - Saints
TEs - NE
O Line - Saints
FB - Saints

WhoDat!656 · 05-29-2012, 08:42 PM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Without reading, i'm saying Saints.

RBs - Saints
WRs - Saints
TEs - NE
O Line - Saints
FB - Saints

You would be wrong

saintsfan1976 · 05-29-2012, 08:47 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

You would be wrong

Prove it

TheOak · 05-30-2012, 07:03 AM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Prove it

Graham over Gronk any day.

HughC · 06-01-2012, 06:25 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

Graham over Gronk any day.

Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too.

Saints are better at WR and RB
Patriots get more from the TE position
Both are very good at QB and OL

Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19).

Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs.

saintsfan1976 · 06-01-2012, 09:20 PM

Originally Posted by HughC

Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too.

Saints are better at WR and RB
Patriots get more from the TE position
Both are very good at QB and OL

Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19).

Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs.

Nice first post. Welcome aboard Hugh.

pherein · 06-02-2012, 09:26 PM

Originally Posted by HughC

Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too.

Saints are better at WR and RB
Patriots get more from the TE position
Both are very good at QB and OL

Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19).

Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs.

Great post. I still consider Graham a better pass catcher and Gronk to be better after then runner after the catch. Which make them even in my book. NE does have a better TE core thou.

The only reason I consider the Saints might have a better WR core is it has proven vets with Henderson,Moore Colston, and Arrington. Plus adding Toon helps. Arrington is not thrown to much, but his catch percentage is 82%. He just hasn't seen the field much. He seems to be a typical lunch pale WR to me.
Nothing special, but can work fine in our offense.

Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, are just not proven yet. Not saying they are not good, but even Ocho had a problem learning to catch for Brady and he's a vet.
I think Lloyd will be a star there, personally, he's good. What about the difference in OL?

HughC · 06-02-2012, 10:39 PM

Originally Posted by pherein

Great post. I still consider Graham a better pass catcher and Gronk to be better after then runner after the catch. Which make them even in my book. NE does have a better TE core thou.

The only reason I consider the Saints might have a better WR core is it has proven vets with Henderson,Moore Colston, and Arrington. Plus adding Toon helps. Arrington is not thrown to much, but his catch percentage is 82%. He just hasn't seen the field much. He seems to be a typical lunch pale WR to me.
Nothing special, but can work fine in our offense.

Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, are just not proven yet. Not saying they are not good, but even Ocho had a problem learning to catch for Brady and he's a vet.
I think Lloyd will be a start there. What about the difference in OL?

While Lloyd and Gaffney did play on other teams in 2011, I don't think there should be the doubt that they can figure it out the way Ochocinco did. Lloyd followed Josh McDaniels to New England and they use the same type of offense, terminology, etc., and Gaffney did well when he played there a couple years ago. If Gaffney can get 947 yards with Rex Grossman throwing the ball last year then he should be fine with Brady as his QB. Lloyd had 2414 yards and 16 TD over the last two years, so again I don't envision an Ochocinco type of dropoff.

I think it looks like the Patriots WRs should be slightly better than the Saints WRs in 2012, but the Saints still have a big advantage with their RBs - not just running the ball, but especially in the passing game - which could/should make the Saints offense still slightly better than the Patriots offense this year.

As for the OL it looks to me like both are very good, both in terms of starters as well as depth for when the inevitable injury strikes.

saintsfan1976 · 06-01-2012, 09:21 PM

Originally Posted by x626xBlack

Graham over Gronk any day.

Hernandez over Thomas (or whoever "starts" this year)

CharityMike · 05-29-2012, 09:38 PM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Without reading, i'm saying Saints.

RBs - Saints
WRs - Saints
TEs - NE
O Line - Saints
FB - Saints

Not far off IMO.

Rbs- Definitely Saints
Wrs- Wash
Tes- Definitely NE
O Line- Wash

Saints for the obvious reason. We can run the ball better which makes us more dynamic.

05-29-2012, 08:42 PM	#2
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,086	Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Without reading, i'm saying Saints. RBs - Saints WRs - Saints TEs - NE O Line - Saints FB - Saints You would be wrong

05-29-2012, 08:47 PM	#3
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,996 Blog Entries: 3	Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 You would be wrong Prove it

05-30-2012, 07:03 AM	#4
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,043	Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Prove it Graham over Gronk any day.

06-01-2012, 06:25 PM	#5
HughC Rookie Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2	Originally Posted by x626xBlack Graham over Gronk any day. Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too. Saints are better at WR and RB Patriots get more from the TE position Both are very good at QB and OL Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19). Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs.
HughC Rookie Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2

06-01-2012, 09:20 PM	#6
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,996 Blog Entries: 3	Originally Posted by HughC Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too. Saints are better at WR and RB Patriots get more from the TE position Both are very good at QB and OL Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19). Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs. Nice first post. Welcome aboard Hugh.

05-29-2012, 08:37 PM	#1
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,996 Blog Entries: 3	Without reading, i'm saying Saints. RBs - Saints WRs - Saints TEs - NE O Line - Saints FB - Saints

06-02-2012, 09:26 PM	#7
pherein failclownHunter Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: N.O. and V.A. Posts: 2,260 Blog Entries: 3	Originally Posted by HughC Graham is incredible, but at minimum they're even. Virtually the same number of receptions and yards, but Gronkowski had 7 more TD; he's a very good blocker too. Saints are better at WR and RB Patriots get more from the TE position Both are very good at QB and OL Overall a slight edge to the Saints, probably because of the versatility and not relying on so few players. Saints scored 2.1 more points per game, had 39 more yards per game, passed for 263 more yards and ran for 363 more yards. Turnovers are about equal (NE 17; NO 19). Looking ahead New England may (or may not) be able to surpass the Saints offense in 2012, adding Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, Daniel Fells as a 3rd TE, etc., but to do so they'll need to get good production from one or both of their 2nd-year running backs. Great post. I still consider Graham a better pass catcher and Gronk to be better after then runner after the catch. Which make them even in my book. NE does have a better TE core thou. The only reason I consider the Saints might have a better WR core is it has proven vets with Henderson,Moore Colston, and Arrington. Plus adding Toon helps. Arrington is not thrown to much, but his catch percentage is 82%. He just hasn't seen the field much. He seems to be a typical lunch pale WR to me. Nothing special, but can work fine in our offense. Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, are just not proven yet. Not saying they are not good, but even Ocho had a problem learning to catch for Brady and he's a vet. I think Lloyd will be a star there, personally, he's good. What about the difference in OL?
	Saints proved that pigs could fly in 2009. Now its time for another miracle SuperBowl and go where no pig has gone before. Last edited by pherein; 06-02-2012 at 10:25 PM..

06-02-2012, 10:39 PM	#8
HughC Rookie Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2	Originally Posted by pherein Great post. I still consider Graham a better pass catcher and Gronk to be better after then runner after the catch. Which make them even in my book. NE does have a better TE core thou. The only reason I consider the Saints might have a better WR core is it has proven vets with Henderson,Moore Colston, and Arrington. Plus adding Toon helps. Arrington is not thrown to much, but his catch percentage is 82%. He just hasn't seen the field much. He seems to be a typical lunch pale WR to me. Nothing special, but can work fine in our offense. Brandon Lloyd, Jabar Gaffney, are just not proven yet. Not saying they are not good, but even Ocho had a problem learning to catch for Brady and he's a vet. I think Lloyd will be a start there. What about the difference in OL? While Lloyd and Gaffney did play on other teams in 2011, I don't think there should be the doubt that they can figure it out the way Ochocinco did. Lloyd followed Josh McDaniels to New England and they use the same type of offense, terminology, etc., and Gaffney did well when he played there a couple years ago. If Gaffney can get 947 yards with Rex Grossman throwing the ball last year then he should be fine with Brady as his QB. Lloyd had 2414 yards and 16 TD over the last two years, so again I don't envision an Ochocinco type of dropoff. I think it looks like the Patriots WRs should be slightly better than the Saints WRs in 2012, but the Saints still have a big advantage with their RBs - not just running the ball, but especially in the passing game - which could/should make the Saints offense still slightly better than the Patriots offense this year. As for the OL it looks to me like both are very good, both in terms of starters as well as depth for when the inevitable injury strikes.
HughC Rookie Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 2

06-01-2012, 09:21 PM	#9
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,996 Blog Entries: 3	Originally Posted by x626xBlack Graham over Gronk any day. Hernandez over Thomas (or whoever "starts" this year)

05-29-2012, 09:38 PM	#10
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Without reading, i'm saying Saints. RBs - Saints WRs - Saints TEs - NE O Line - Saints FB - Saints Not far off IMO. Rbs- Definitely Saints Wrs- Wash Tes- Definitely NE O Line- Wash Saints for the obvious reason. We can run the ball better which makes us more dynamic.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44202-better-nfl-offense-patriots-saints.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Better NFL offense: Patriots or Saints? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard	This thread	Refback	05-30-2012 02:18 AM	44
Better NFL offense: Patriots or Saints?	This thread	Refback	05-29-2012 08:37 PM	1