Hargrove Speaks Out!

Halo · 06-19-2012, 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by JimmyB1775

It looks better on paper than it sounded out of his mouth. Regardless, I thought it was suspicious that his face wasn't in view. The glaring inconsistency that I'm seeing is every time they have a specific instance, the numbers don't add up. Games where they have "ledgers" have money amounts that dont match up with play. Here, Hargrove is claiming a bounty he won't collect on because he has nothing to do with the play in question.
Don't we remember the ledger leak that was revised three times?

The "ledger" is also "transcribed" from written notes. The NFL wants to protect the identity of the snitch as the handwriting will give them away.

That means the ledger was not written by Gregg Williams, nor any of the players. So who is left, who are they trying to protect?

If it had to be transcribed because it wasn't legible, then it may not have been interpreted correctly.

ALL of this is circumstantial evidence that would not stand up in a court of law, but because Goodell depended on it to make the decision that Vilma was guilty, it will probably be subpoenaed in his case vs. Goodell. And the court will want the originals and the identity of the writer.

We may soon find out what really went on here as the NFL and Commish are about to be "EXORCISED" by the federal court and judge.

saintfan · 06-19-2012, 05:38 PM

Originally Posted by Halo

The "ledger" is also "transcribed" from written notes. The NFL wants to protect the identity of the snitch as the handwriting will give them away.

That means the ledger was not written by Gregg Williams, nor any of the players. So who is left, who are they trying to protect?

If it had to be transcribed because it wasn't legible, then it may not have been interpreted correctly.

ALL of this is circumstantial evidence that would not stand up in a court of law, but because Goodell depended on it to make the decision that Vilma was guilty, it will probably be subpoenaed in his case vs. Goodell. And the court will want the originals and the identity of the writer.

We may soon find out what really went on here as the NFL and Commish are about to be "EXORCISED" by the federal court and judge.

I bet Roger is wishing he could destroy THIS 'evidence' too - but even he isn't that stupid...or is he? What is better? Should he show up with no evidence or should he show up with worthless evidence?

Halo · 06-19-2012, 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by saintfan

I bet Roger is wishing he could destroy THIS 'evidence' too - but even he isn't that stupid...or is he? What is better? Should he show up with no evidence or should he show up with worthless evidence?

Why have a press conference AFTER the hearings to show evidence when the NFL had a deadline on Friday to share evidence with the players but they missed their own deadline.

Regardless, without having the evidence in hand before the meeting (as per New York law which the hearing should have complied with as per the terms of the CBA) the players showed up.

This prompted Goodell to call for a recess when he got owned by Vilma's attorney for not following his own Kangaroo Court rules.

Then, after all hearings were held for the day, the NFL presented evidence to 12 select New York press reporters...... BUT FAILED TO ENTER THE SAME EVIDENCE TO EACH PLAYER BEFORE THE HEARING AS PER THEIR RULES!???

THE FREAKING PRESS CONFERENCE WAS NOT EVEN PUBLICIZED AND MOST MEDIA (THOSE WHO HAVE QUESTIONED GOODELL) WERE NOT THERE TO ATTEND?

06-19-2012, 05:32 PM	#1
Halo Site Donor MONTHLY Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 20,854 Blog Entries: 45	Exocism of Goodell Originally Posted by JimmyB1775 It looks better on paper than it sounded out of his mouth. Regardless, I thought it was suspicious that his face wasn't in view. The glaring inconsistency that I'm seeing is every time they have a specific instance, the numbers don't add up. Games where they have "ledgers" have money amounts that dont match up with play. Here, Hargrove is claiming a bounty he won't collect on because he has nothing to do with the play in question. Don't we remember the ledger leak that was revised three times? The "ledger" is also "transcribed" from written notes. The NFL wants to protect the identity of the snitch as the handwriting will give them away. That means the ledger was not written by Gregg Williams, nor any of the players. So who is left, who are they trying to protect? If it had to be transcribed because it wasn't legible, then it may not have been interpreted correctly. ALL of this is circumstantial evidence that would not stand up in a court of law, but because Goodell depended on it to make the decision that Vilma was guilty, it will probably be subpoenaed in his case vs. Goodell. And the court will want the originals and the identity of the writer. We may soon find out what really went on here as the NFL and Commish are about to be "EXORCISED" by the federal court and judge. Beastmode likes this.
	Like blackandgold.com on facebook follow us on Twitter

06-19-2012, 05:38 PM	#2
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Originally Posted by Halo The "ledger" is also "transcribed" from written notes. The NFL wants to protect the identity of the snitch as the handwriting will give them away. That means the ledger was not written by Gregg Williams, nor any of the players. So who is left, who are they trying to protect? If it had to be transcribed because it wasn't legible, then it may not have been interpreted correctly. ALL of this is circumstantial evidence that would not stand up in a court of law, but because Goodell depended on it to make the decision that Vilma was guilty, it will probably be subpoenaed in his case vs. Goodell. And the court will want the originals and the identity of the writer. We may soon find out what really went on here as the NFL and Commish are about to be "EXORCISED" by the federal court and judge. I bet Roger is wishing he could destroy THIS 'evidence' too - but even he isn't that stupid...or is he? What is better? Should he show up with no evidence or should he show up with worthless evidence?

06-19-2012, 05:48 PM	#3
Halo Site Donor MONTHLY Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 20,854 Blog Entries: 45	Originally Posted by saintfan I bet Roger is wishing he could destroy THIS 'evidence' too - but even he isn't that stupid...or is he? What is better? Should he show up with no evidence or should he show up with worthless evidence? Why have a press conference AFTER the hearings to show evidence when the NFL had a deadline on Friday to share evidence with the players but they missed their own deadline. Regardless, without having the evidence in hand before the meeting (as per New York law which the hearing should have complied with as per the terms of the CBA) the players showed up. This prompted Goodell to call for a recess when he got owned by Vilma's attorney for not following his own Kangaroo Court rules. Then, after all hearings were held for the day, the NFL presented evidence to 12 select New York press reporters...... BUT FAILED TO ENTER THE SAME EVIDENCE TO EACH PLAYER BEFORE THE HEARING AS PER THEIR RULES!??? THE FREAKING PRESS CONFERENCE WAS NOT EVEN PUBLICIZED AND MOST MEDIA (THOSE WHO HAVE QUESTIONED GOODELL) WERE NOT THERE TO ATTEND?
	Like blackandgold.com on facebook follow us on Twitter

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44722-hargrove-speaks-out.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Hargrove Speaks Out!	This thread	Refback	06-19-2012 02:58 PM	11