NFL calls 'bounty' evidence authentic; Vitt questions

Halo · 06-21-2012, 03:54 PM

If you're a fan from a rival team...
if you think the Saints are 1000% guilty of a scandalous bounty....
if you think every player is lying and the Saints are guilty before being innocent....
if you are reading this....
if you HATE the Saints in general....

if YOU have any shred of REASONABLE THINKING then this video piece and "authentic evidence" MUST leave SOME doubt in your mind.

This ledger is heavily depended on by Goodell against Vilma as evidence. On the same ledger Vitt's name appears as "Vitt = $5000"

When Vitt questions this the league says that this ledger did not play into his punishment. When the league is questioned about this, the NFL is "unable to corroborate the $ figure for Vitt."

But they are able to corroborate this ledger as evidence for VIlma?

It's called faulty or flawed evidence and leads ANYONE to believe that this typed letter from a handwritten note (which is flawed to start with) is a falsehood: a fabrication. It's not reliable.

This "ledger" will not be admissible in a court of law and a judge may strike it from the record completely so it cannot be considered evidence of ANYTHING.

Therefore, if this ledger is so key to the NFL's case against Vilma, and the ledger is either a fake or fabrication, then where does that leave Vilma's case??????

SmashMouth · 06-21-2012, 04:46 PM

Originally Posted by Halo

If you're a fan from a rival team...
if you think the Saints are 1000% guilty of a scandalous bounty....
if you think every player is lying and the Saints are guilty before being innocent....
if you are reading this....
if you HATE the Saints in general....

if YOU have any shred of REASONABLE THINKING then this video piece and "authentic evidence" MUST leave SOME doubt in your mind.

This ledger is heavily depended on by Goodell against Vilma as evidence. On the same ledger Vitt's name appears as "Vitt = $5000"

When Vitt questions this the league says that this ledger did not play into his punishment. When the league is questioned about this, the NFL is "unable to corroborate the $ figure for Vitt."

But they are able to corroborate this ledger as evidence for VIlma?

It's called faulty or flawed evidence and leads ANYONE to believe that this typed letter from a handwritten note (which is flawed to start with) is a falsehood: a fabrication. It's not reliable.

This "ledger" will not be admissible in a court of law and a judge may strike it from the record completely so it cannot be considered evidence of ANYTHING.

Therefore, if this ledger is so key to the NFL's case against Vilma, and the ledger is either a fake or fabrication, then where does that leave Vilma's case??????

Even more millions for Vilma payable by Goodell.... I LOVE IT!

06-21-2012, 03:54 PM	#1
Halo Site Donor MONTHLY Join Date: May 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 20,854 Blog Entries: 45	Flawed evdence If you're a fan from a rival team... if you think the Saints are 1000% guilty of a scandalous bounty.... if you think every player is lying and the Saints are guilty before being innocent.... if you are reading this.... if you HATE the Saints in general.... if YOU have any shred of REASONABLE THINKING then this video piece and "authentic evidence" MUST leave SOME doubt in your mind. This ledger is heavily depended on by Goodell against Vilma as evidence. On the same ledger Vitt's name appears as "Vitt = $5000" When Vitt questions this the league says that this ledger did not play into his punishment. When the league is questioned about this, the NFL is "unable to corroborate the $ figure for Vitt." But they are able to corroborate this ledger as evidence for VIlma? It's called faulty or flawed evidence and leads ANYONE to believe that this typed letter from a handwritten note (which is flawed to start with) is a falsehood: a fabrication. It's not reliable. This "ledger" will not be admissible in a court of law and a judge may strike it from the record completely so it cannot be considered evidence of ANYTHING. Therefore, if this ledger is so key to the NFL's case against Vilma, and the ledger is either a fake or fabrication, then where does that leave Vilma's case?????? QBREES9 likes this.
	Like blackandgold.com on facebook follow us on Twitter

06-21-2012, 04:46 PM	#2
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,479 Blog Entries: 29	Originally Posted by Halo If you're a fan from a rival team... if you think the Saints are 1000% guilty of a scandalous bounty.... if you think every player is lying and the Saints are guilty before being innocent.... if you are reading this.... if you HATE the Saints in general.... if YOU have any shred of REASONABLE THINKING then this video piece and "authentic evidence" MUST leave SOME doubt in your mind. This ledger is heavily depended on by Goodell against Vilma as evidence. On the same ledger Vitt's name appears as "Vitt = $5000" When Vitt questions this the league says that this ledger did not play into his punishment. When the league is questioned about this, the NFL is "unable to corroborate the $ figure for Vitt." But they are able to corroborate this ledger as evidence for VIlma? It's called faulty or flawed evidence and leads ANYONE to believe that this typed letter from a handwritten note (which is flawed to start with) is a falsehood: a fabrication. It's not reliable. This "ledger" will not be admissible in a court of law and a judge may strike it from the record completely so it cannot be considered evidence of ANYTHING. Therefore, if this ledger is so key to the NFL's case against Vilma, and the ledger is either a fake or fabrication, then where does that leave Vilma's case?????? Even more millions for Vilma payable by Goodell.... I LOVE IT!

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44781-nfl-calls-bounty-evidence-authentic-vitt-questions.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
NFL calls 'bounty' evidence authentic; Vitt questions	This thread	Refback	06-21-2012 02:31 PM	5