|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; But here’s where the NFL’s logic may contain a hole. The CBA doesn’t say that the Commissioner must handle the appeals. Instead, it gives the Commissioner the ability to appoint the person who’ll handle the appeals. Given that the Federal ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,075
|
![]()
But here’s where the NFL’s logic may contain a hole. The CBA doesn’t say that the Commissioner must handle the appeals. Instead, it gives the Commissioner the ability to appoint the person who’ll handle the appeals. Given that the Federal Arbitration Act expressly requires an impartial arbitrator, the Commissioner could have — and arguably should have — tapped on the shoulder someone in the office who had not been involved in the investigation or preliminary decision making.
Given that Goodell had direct involvement in the investigation and, presumably, access to the full scope of evidence (much of which wasn’t introduced at the appeal hearing), a judge could find that Goodell should have been mindful of the requirements of the Federal Arbitration Act in identifying a truly impartial person who could resolve the appeals. In bounty lawsuit, NFL focuses on players’ failure to participate in hearings | ProFootballTalk |
"A Veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount of "up to and including my life."
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/46360-bounty-lawsuit-nfl-focuses-players-failure-participate-hearings.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
In bounty lawsuit, NFL focuses on players’ failure to participate in hearings | This thread | Refback | 07-20-2012 11:16 PM | 1 |