08-05-2012, 06:30 PM
|
#1
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 34
|
Originally Posted by pherein
Why wouldn't you put Rogers behind Orton for accuracy ? I mean if the throws prove it. We are not going on fiction or belief here. Thats a bad stat,lol
I was surprised to Brady at 21. One would think it, but there it is. This isn't a QBR and everyone gets the same rules.
The reason I wouldn't put Rodgers behind Orton for accuracy is because Orton doesn't throw long. It's a bit like comparing kickers by looking at how many kicks they make, without checking whether one of them does nothing but PATs while the other is trying 60-yard FGs.
There are only three possible candidates for "greatest QB in the league" - Brees, Rodgers, Brady. No-one else can make any sort of case. If any stat puts two of those three 9th and 21st, it's a sign that the stat is no use in evaluation - not a sign that Rodgers is worse than Orton and that Brady isn't top 20.
I'm not disputing that Brees may be best in the league - I'm only disputing that this stat is any use.
|
|
|
|