|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Hehehehe......... OK, this should be fun. Maybe we can even get our own show. Like John Clayton and Sean Salisbury.. :P First of all I intend to show that council (WhoDat) has a personel vendetta against my client (Aaron Brooks) ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
In regard to Psycho’s view on Aaron Brooks...
Hehehehe.........
OK, this should be fun. Maybe we can even get our own show. Like John Clayton and Sean Salisbury.. :P First of all I intend to show that council (WhoDat) has a personel vendetta against my client (Aaron Brooks) and I will show that Mr. WhoDat\'s evidence is CLEARY without merit or substance. Your horor, if I may please proceed!! Mr. WhoDat contends:
This test shows that Mr. Einstein failed a simple entrance exam and in no way is a reflection of Mr. Einstien\'s intelligence. Your honor, I ask you, if Mr. Einstein failure to pass a simple entrance exam doesn\'t reflect poorly on his intelligence ... How can Mr. Brooks wonderlic score be held against him?? Judge rules jury to ignore Aaron Brooks wonderlic score!! Thank you, Your Honor. Now, Mr. WhoDat also contends my client (Mr. Aaron Brooks) is not an intelligent person based on:
Mr. WhoDat, would you like to tell the 3 people of the jury, who have their hand raised, that THEY aren\'t intelligent??!! Then Mr. WhoDat would like us to believe a couple of NFL scouts who say Mr. Brooks isn\'t intelligent. I submit into evidence a scouting report on one Mr. Ryan Leaf!! Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, do you know where Mr. Leaf is today? He\'s out of the NFL and the last we heard he was washing cars down at the \"Soap and Suds.\" I rest my case, Your Honor. Judge: Case dismissed!!! :P :P |
![]() |