Quad-W (Week 2)

Danno · 09-14-2012, 02:29 PM

WIDW - What I disagree With...

Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS
The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs

Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS
We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams

The Dude · 09-14-2012, 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

WIDW - What I disagree With...

Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS
The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs

Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS
We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams

Yea I didn't get that especially since the wrote that the Redskins obviously own tiebreaker over us. Makes me think it was a misprint. I think the Rams will beat them. LOL Cowherd said today that the Rams were an "EXCELLENT" team LMFAo. Anyway I agree with you we must pull for Rams as they are no threat whatsoever.

I disagree about the Bucs. They are probably no real threat, but its too early to tell, especially with the way we played Sunday. Until we field a better team, which will likely be this Sunday, I am not convinced we won't have a hard time handling the Bucs. I would agree with you if this was a bit later in the season and we knew our teams identity with the coaching situation but now I just am not convinced.

Stealthman · 09-15-2012, 05:44 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

WIDW - What I disagree With...

Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS
The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs

Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS
We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams

Danno,

That was a typo... I should have written: Pull for the Rams.

I think you know that, since I acknowledged that the Redskins own the tiebreaker.

Good catch.

Danno · 09-16-2012, 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by Stealthman

Danno,

That was a typo... I should have written: Pull for the Rams.

I think you know that, since I acknowledged that the Redskins own the tiebreaker.

Good catch.

Its my job to keep you on your toes. Now drop and gives us 20.

09-14-2012, 02:29 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,757	Re: Quad-W (Week 2) WIDW - What I disagree With... Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams

09-14-2012, 02:40 PM	#2
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060	Re: Quad-W (Week 2) Originally Posted by Danno WIDW - What I disagree With... Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams Yea I didn't get that especially since the wrote that the Redskins obviously own tiebreaker over us. Makes me think it was a misprint. I think the Rams will beat them. LOL Cowherd said today that the Rams were an "EXCELLENT" team LMFAo. Anyway I agree with you we must pull for Rams as they are no threat whatsoever. I disagree about the Bucs. They are probably no real threat, but its too early to tell, especially with the way we played Sunday. Until we field a better team, which will likely be this Sunday, I am not convinced we won't have a hard time handling the Bucs. I would agree with you if this was a bit later in the season and we knew our teams identity with the coaching situation but now I just am not convinced.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,060

09-15-2012, 05:44 PM	#3
Stealthman B&G StaffWriter Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Wake Forest, NC Posts: 382	Re: Quad-W (Week 2) Originally Posted by Danno WIDW - What I disagree With... Week 2, Game 2: BUCCANEERS @ GIANTS The Bucs are no real threat. The Giants are. Pull for the Bucs Week 2, Game 11: REDSKINS @ RAMS We must finish ahead of the Skins, and the Rams are no playoff threat. Pull for the Rams Danno, That was a typo... I should have written: Pull for the Rams. I think you know that, since I acknowledged that the Redskins own the tiebreaker. Good catch.

09-16-2012, 07:54 AM	#4
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,757	Re: Quad-W (Week 2) Originally Posted by Stealthman Danno, That was a typo... I should have written: Pull for the Rams. I think you know that, since I acknowledged that the Redskins own the tiebreaker. Good catch. Its my job to keep you on your toes. Now drop and gives us 20.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/50124-quad-w-week-2-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Quad-W (Week 2)	This thread	Refback	09-14-2012 03:05 PM	1