|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Mardigras9 LOL, can't wait till they implode. LOL I didn't have to wait for your team....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-01-2012, 06:07 PM | #11 |
100th Post
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 450
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-01-2012, 06:54 PM | #12 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,961
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
Assuming that they (Brees & Carmichael) still gameplan the way they (Brees & Payton) did, I would think that Brees has a lot of input already into how they are going to run plays during the course of the game.
I don't know if taking the play calling responsibility away from the guy who's job it is, is really a good idea, even if we are taking about a limited number of these types of situations within the game. The coordinator is removed from the actual game play and that gives him a certain advantage over a QB who's constantly engaged in the game and has to already think about several other things, so I'd keep it in Carmichael's hands. One of the arguments for causing the Saints' offense to be less explosive than it was a year to go has been that Brees might have taken too much on his plate with the absence of Payton. While I'm not saying that this argument is right, I'd still err on the side of caution in adding to the responsibilities Brees already has. |
"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno
|
|
10-01-2012, 09:43 PM | #13 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,048
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
Hell Im all for Urkel coming in and calling plays. Anything different to try is better than nothing.
|
10-01-2012, 10:20 PM | #14 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
That really bothered me. Even if Sproles catches that ball it would have still bothered me.
|
10-02-2012, 11:02 AM | #15 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
I thought the same thing -- I wondered if maybe the last play of last year's opener game was "inside our heads" down there -- that maybe Carmichael was feeling deja vu and was too spooked to try running it. It bothered me a lot. Because in my mind THAT'S the situation when you're SUPPOSED to run that same exact play again, with all the bad blood from a year ago, and this time you get a surge and make it work.
|
10-03-2012, 02:15 PM | #16 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,887
|
Re: Question for the Forum:
If Jimmy stops catching balls with his body and uses his hand thenn thats a touchdown...Oh and was that a screen to ingram on the one?
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51298-question-forum.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Question for the Forum: | This thread | Refback | 10-01-2012 10:45 PM | 2 |