![]() |
PT needs to be our Feature back!!
That's all
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
+ 1
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
we also need to screen and run consistently from the beginning, quit waiting until the 4th quarter
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
He already is. Am I missing something?
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
He is. We just don't run a whole lot so you would never know.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
He is its just we don't really use a "featured" back. He runs harder then any of our backs, that's why he is listed as the starter. I'm just not getting what wrong with Ingram. Is it size? Is it because our O-line doesn't open big enough holes for him and a smaller back like PT takes advantage? Wish we could get him working like PT.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
PT is always Punishment Time.
|
We need to move away from the three headed approach. Teams know that when Ingram is in its going to be up the middle. Leaving PT in most of the downs is way moving forward.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
PT is the 2nd most valuable player on this team. He could win games for us if they'd let him.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I'll rephrase then- PT needs to get the ball more!! The split carries sucks! I'm think the other backs come in to give PT a breather, and that's it. I won't write off Ingram because who knows what he could do if he got the ball more than 4 times a game.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
The still both ended up with about the same average rushing. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I was screaming at the Television to leave him in the game - just before the play he lost his helmet.
I scared the dogs... It looked like he was getting into a rhythm. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I say feed him the rock and let him get those hard yards, it helps to set up the screen and maybe it'll get ingram more involved.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Committing to the run tonight was so huge. I loved it.
What our play callers don't seem to keep in mind is that even if we're only getting 2 yards/play, running the ball starts to wear-down d-lines. If we would keep pounding the ball with PT and Ingram maybe we could actually get Drew some time to throw long balls instead of having to rush the short throws that wind up getting picked... |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
RB's have to get into a groove. It often takes them 10 to 15 carries to find their rythym. We gotta run early and often.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Pierre Thomas is the guy that if you really need to, you can put the whole team on his shoulders, and he will CARRY THEM DOWN THE FIELD , for a little while. If you give him the ball he can TAKE A GAME OVER, for a drive or two drives, and I think the non-Payton coaches FINALLY remembered that tonight. It wasn't really number of carries, or that he wore the defense down, or even that he is really THAT good -- it was that Pierre TOOK **** OVER and became untackle-able, when they fed him the ball.
It's not a stat I can point to, concretely, but I felt like there were a lot less of the "panicky" or "jittery" pass/pass/pass 3 and outs tonight, when we were behind. There were some, in the game, but once Pierre got involved, passing and running, things really calmed down. It's kinda what I had been waiting for. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
You would think that the guy we drafted by trading back in the first round a couple of years ago would be our starting RB by now. We all know who that is. As far as PT goes, he has been the best RB so far.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I think those carries that PT got down the stretch is what really broke down the Chargers defense. He may not have been getting large bulks of yards, but he was grinding them down with some of the toughest runs I've seen from a Saints back since Deuce was healthy. That last long drive the Saints put up had the Chargers offense on the sideline seething and they were there long enough to have to think about what they needed to do to come back and win (which isn't always a good thing). It also gave the Saints defense time to rest up so they could get on the field and pin their ears back in getting after Rivers. When the Chargers got back on offense, they had penalties that hurt them and you could tell they weren't playing with their heads on straight because they were looking for penalties against the Saints every single play. PT's runs, Drew's timely passes, and protecting the football on that last drive were the things that helped finish off the Chargers.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
We looked our normal selves last night, offense was unpredictable mixing run and pass well
The big screen to Pierre was a huge play, Pierre is crucial to our offense getting going |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Agreed. He runs with passion and heart. He might be the most motivated player we have too.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Is he not our first option?
Now if you mean 20+ touches - tried that and that's not him... When you got a fresh stable of horses - you keep your horses fresh by not running them into the ground one by one... |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
How do all of those other teams that have two backs manage to keep them fresh? |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
And they dont have those horses for long.
Can anyone list 32 running backs in the league with over 6 years experience that are work horses for their team and GOOD at it? Not every team gets a Jackson/Foster (injured a bit)/Peterson/Gore... You also cant workhorse the screen 20 times a game.. Thats where PT shines. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I love when PT and Sproles are both in the game at the same time. Last night the Chargers commited to stopping Sproles. Put PT in at the same time and it opens up. Kept putting Sproles wide, pulls one out of the box, opens for PT.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I think they're just trying to keep him fresh (and healthy) but I agree with the premise that he needs to be getting the lion's share of the carries. I like Sproles a lot, but he obviously wasn't getting it done early yesterday. I'd rather see Sproles sprinkled in throughout the game.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I agree fully. MI has been MIA. I think they should put him on inactive and bring up the bull. We need a shot in the running game.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
PT23 is the man without a doubt. He can do things that no one else on our team(and most other teams) can do.
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Last 3 games...
Mark Ingram - 15 carries, 38 yards, 2.53 yards per carry Pierre Thomas 24 carries, 55 yards, 2.29 yards per carry Maybe its not the RB thats the problem. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
Or do you need to throw in the only game we ran well in this entire season, in which all of PT's 2nd half carries came when we were 3 scores behind. Convenient indeed. Stats are easily manipulated when taken out of context aren't they? ;) |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
They are when people are not logic oriented.. First thing that came to mind when I read your post was... We are in week 5.. certainly there is a logical reason why weeks 1 and 2 would be excluded from the data set. After all this is Danno.:clown: Sort of like choosing to address 1 line out of 50 in a post. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
If a RB has 25 carries, 24 for 1 yard and 1 for 99 during garbage time, do you really think he's a 4 yard per carry RB? Or are his stats skewed by that one run? I'm pretty sure the consensus is our O-line (or playcalling) has more to do with our failures at rushing than which RB we use. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I really don't care about the stats, if one of the RBs gets into a groove...
Hand them the rock, pull them off for a breather and see if the next one feeds off the first one. This running of/off the field causes them to wonder "Am I supposed to stay on the field?" instead of just turning around and heading back to the huddle or formation. Let the receivers run on/off the field and let the RB get into a grove... less predictable anyway You can change backs a couple of times a series not every down... |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
thats exactly what i've been saying this whole time.... Give someone... ANYONE a chance to get hot... this 1 rush and head to the sideline is really PISSING me off.... Last year we were 6th in the league rushing ... Lets keep whats working and GROUND AND POUND!!!
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
Play calling I buy. |
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
I agree....make Sproles Royce the scatback (Reggie's Role) and make Ivory the bruising 3rd down/fight for yards back(Mike Bell's Role) and we are money for a solid run game.....And trade Ingram for a safety
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
Quote:
|
Re: PT needs to be our Feature back!!
The o-line has been sucking. Too much pressure on Brees by the front 4 which causes him to throw int's and to get sacked. Also, it appears the defenses are keying on sproles when he is in the game like they did bush's 2nd year. sproles and PT in the backfield may keep them more honest. I still think MI is trash. Reminds me of Vaughn Dunbar.Alot of hype for all that wipe!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com