|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'm wondering this year if we might benefit a little from the regular refs because of the way goodell and the league screwed us and them. Maybe they feel for us this year and will give us the close calls....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-09-2012, 09:11 AM | #11 |
A Cajun Transforming TX
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
|
Re: Refs?
I'm wondering this year if we might benefit a little from the regular refs because of the way goodell and the league screwed us and them. Maybe they feel for us this year and will give us the close calls.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-09-2012, 09:15 AM | #12 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: Refs?
... yeah.. only those 2 calls were bull****... and that's why the Chargers lost... yeah... that's the ticket..
|
10-09-2012, 09:16 AM | #13 |
Site Donor 2019
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
|
Re: Refs?
San Diego had 7 penalties for 56 yards
Saints had 10 penalties for 99 yards If they were out to help the Saints, they did a great job covering it up. |
10-09-2012, 09:32 AM | #14 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
Re: Refs?
Originally Posted by SloMotion
I still contend that it was planned. I believe that since they were refs themselves they had to favor the regular refs during this dispute. If slowing the game down and getting people complaining was going to help their cause, why not act stupid, or take one for the team. Someday the replacements may be professional themselves and they may benefit by their seeminly lack of competence.
I could be wrong, but there was just too many cases of it. If it was real, then the regulars are indeed a part of the product and have clout. They see guys making millions and believe they deserve to at least be in the same ball park with these guys, since without them, the product is diminished so much. |
Whether you think you can or think you can't...you're right!
|
|
10-09-2012, 10:02 AM | #15 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 4,375
|
Re: Refs?
Those calls were suspect, but the inability of the left O-line to stop Wilson in the end decided the game.
|
10-09-2012, 11:26 AM | #16 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: Refs?
Well roughing the passer is one of those things where fans of different teams will NEVER see eye to eye. If it was "your guy" you'd be howling if it wasn't called. I think that was a great call by the officials and Drew deserved to have that turnover nullified.
Now the offensive pass interference on Gates, welllll it's a lot like holding -- it's a judgement call by the official. That's why they actually have names like Back Judge, Side Judge and Field Judge! The conventional wisdom is that holding happens on every NFL play, but normally holding doesn't get called or "shouldn't" get called, unless it affects the outcome of the play. For example a 30 yard run that should have been a 5 yard run without the crucial hold that sprung the guy -- that holding definitely affected the play and will usually result in the play getting called back. So typically, holding on a suspiciously long gain, will get called quite often. Also on kick returns for example. It's always a really great kick or punt return that gets brought back by offensive holding or block in the back, isn't it? They almost NEVER call a block in the back or hold when the return guy just runs smack into a wall of bodies and falls down at the 20 or whatever. Even though jersey-grabbing and blocking in the back happens on almost every kick and punt return, as those guys run down the field. And there WAS a bit of contact there on the Gates pass, which did in turn influence the outcome of the play, so I don't know how you can justifiably say it was suspicious or bogus. If the ball had been incomplete, or uncatchable, if it had been wildly overthrown, and the offensive pass interference penalty was still called on San Diego, THAT would have been suspicious. |
10-09-2012, 11:30 AM | #17 |
Team Doctor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Deep South
Posts: 856
|
Re: Refs?
I was actually at the game so I didn't get to see the replays but no matter what, the refs reset it all back to zero with the 5 yard automatic first down penalty.
|
10-09-2012, 12:05 PM | #18 |
OUR NEW REGIME!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 564
|
Re: Refs?
I'm not saying that the Chargers would have won if not for those calls but those were two awesome completions and Rivers is known for coming back in situations like that.
Both of those calls were horrible. Even the commentators said that.No, I'm not making excuses. Best bet would be to not let the team get into a situation like that. |
10-09-2012, 12:22 PM | #19 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,052
|
Re: Refs?
Bolts, I feel your pain. We've been screwed by the refs and now so have you. Everyone is going to get the short end of the stick some time.
|
10-09-2012, 12:34 PM | #20 |
500th Post
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hub City
Posts: 576
|
Re: Refs?
I literally read an article today about how Rivers was known for coming back in those situations (pre 2010), but in 2010, 2011, and 2012 he has actually been far worse...not saying he couldn't have come back, just that the statistics say it would have been unlikely.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51744-refs.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Refs? | This thread | Refback | 10-09-2012 06:42 AM | 2 |