NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED

AsylumGuido · 10-10-2012, 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by CharityMike

See the problem is we are not the NFL. If Godell came out and said what you did, they would all be crying. But because he is hammering us, it is ok and must be the gospel. Also don't leave out the fact you are talking about someone from his team. It's like in my post above yours, go away falcon fan. Should have known better than to think anyone from that crap fan base would actually be able to see through bull****.

Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed.

CharityMike · 10-10-2012, 04:45 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed.

It improves the quality of the board when we are talking football. This is not football. This is a crime that is happening to our team. We have all kinda folks on this board from other teams but none of them are stupid enough to come on here and challenge us on a topic that is very personal. I don't expect many to understand our love affair with our team. Coming on here and insulting our intelligence isn't going to make me all warm and fuzzy. Some people need to learn there place. You wanna talk about us and our team negatively, go to smack talk. Don't come in here preaching the bible of a dictator, it don't go over well.

Radical · 10-10-2012, 07:29 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed.

I don't think people are going to look past the fact that I'm a Falcons fan when I post. I'm sure they all think I'm some Georgia hillbilly that's laughing maniacally and twiddling my fingers together as the whole thing unfolds, simply because it's happening to the Saints. My views wouldn't be any different if it was us, you guys, the Steelers, the Cardinals, etc.

CharityMike · 10-10-2012, 07:40 PM

Originally Posted by Radical

I don't think people are going to look past the fact that I'm a Falcons fan when I post. I'm sure they all think I'm some Georgia hillbilly that's laughing maniacally and twiddling my fingers together as the whole thing unfolds, simply because it's happening to the Saints. My views wouldn't be any different if it was us, you guys, the Steelers, the Cardinals, etc.

Actually, I didn't realize you were a Falcon fan until way into the debate. BUT now that I know, it explains a lot as to why anyone would come here on our site and try to tell us we don't know what we are talking about.

I have no problem talking football with anyone, I don't care who there team is. You may not be a hillbilly but obviously your a few french fry's short of a happy meal if you think coming on here arguing the side of the kommisar is going to win anyone over.

Radical · 10-10-2012, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

Maybe you need to read this article!

Falcons' Robinson fined $40k for illegal hit on Eagles' Maclin - NFL.com

Again, the defenseless receiver rule is impossible to coach for. What was Robinson supposed to do? I guess he could have let him take a few steps up field before making contact... but I don't think that would fly with anyone.

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

Ok, let me get this straight:
Hitting another as hard as you can with legal hits, even if the other gets hurt, is good.
Hitting another as hard as you can with legal hits, even if the other gets hurt, but getting token reward if the other gets hurt, is intent to injure. I got it. Fantastic.

And yes, Mike Smith, when asked specifically about the cleary illegal hits Dunta Robinson landed on defenseless players with the intent to injure them (why else would you land an illegal hit on a defenseless player) he responded "that is how we teach them". He is clearly stating he coaches players to land illegal hits on defenseless players with the intent to injure them.

Yes, because offering payment for injuring other players is illegal? It's funny though your last paragraph. You're practically twisting yourself into a pretzel in an attempt to deflect here.

AsylumGuido · 10-11-2012, 09:23 AM

Originally Posted by Radical

Again, the defenseless receiver rule is impossible to coach for. What was Robinson supposed to do? I guess he could have let him take a few steps up field before making contact... but I don't think that would fly with anyone.

Yes, because offering payment for injuring other players is illegal? It's funny though your last paragraph. You're practically twisting yourself into a pretzel in an attempt to deflect here.

Here is where you are wrong. The Saints players were not offering money for injuring other players. They were offering money for big plays. If a player got hurt in the process it was not the intent, but simply part of the game. Players get hurt every game on exactly the same type of plays.

The Saints were initially accused of intentionally targeting specific players for injury. They have all denied that and no proof has ever been presented that this ever occurred.

10-10-2012, 04:29 PM	#1
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by CharityMike See the problem is we are not the NFL. If Godell came out and said what you did, they would all be crying. But because he is hammering us, it is ok and must be the gospel. Also don't leave out the fact you are talking about someone from his team. It's like in my post above yours, go away falcon fan. Should have known better than to think anyone from that crap fan base would actually be able to see through bull****. Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed.

10-10-2012, 04:45 PM	#2
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed. It improves the quality of the board when we are talking football. This is not football. This is a crime that is happening to our team. We have all kinda folks on this board from other teams but none of them are stupid enough to come on here and challenge us on a topic that is very personal. I don't expect many to understand our love affair with our team. Coming on here and insulting our intelligence isn't going to make me all warm and fuzzy. Some people need to learn there place. You wanna talk about us and our team negatively, go to smack talk. Don't come in here preaching the bible of a dictator, it don't go over well. onebyone likes this.

10-10-2012, 07:29 PM	#3
Radical Falcons Fan Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 148	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Heck, no! I don't ever want to see Rad go away. I honestly feel it improves the quality of a board to have differing opinions and outside input. As long as the member remains within the rules he/she should be allowed. I don't think people are going to look past the fact that I'm a Falcons fan when I post. I'm sure they all think I'm some Georgia hillbilly that's laughing maniacally and twiddling my fingers together as the whole thing unfolds, simply because it's happening to the Saints. My views wouldn't be any different if it was us, you guys, the Steelers, the Cardinals, etc.
Radical Falcons Fan Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 148

10-10-2012, 07:40 PM	#4
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by Radical I don't think people are going to look past the fact that I'm a Falcons fan when I post. I'm sure they all think I'm some Georgia hillbilly that's laughing maniacally and twiddling my fingers together as the whole thing unfolds, simply because it's happening to the Saints. My views wouldn't be any different if it was us, you guys, the Steelers, the Cardinals, etc. Actually, I didn't realize you were a Falcon fan until way into the debate. BUT now that I know, it explains a lot as to why anyone would come here on our site and try to tell us we don't know what we are talking about. I have no problem talking football with anyone, I don't care who there team is. You may not be a hillbilly but obviously your a few french fry's short of a happy meal if you think coming on here arguing the side of the kommisar is going to win anyone over.

10-10-2012, 08:04 PM	#5
Radical Falcons Fan Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 148	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| Maybe you need to read this article! Falcons' Robinson fined $40k for illegal hit on Eagles' Maclin - NFL.com Again, the defenseless receiver rule is impossible to coach for. What was Robinson supposed to do? I guess he could have let him take a few steps up field before making contact... but I don't think that would fly with anyone. Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper Ok, let me get this straight: Hitting another as hard as you can with legal hits, even if the other gets hurt, is good. Hitting another as hard as you can with legal hits, even if the other gets hurt, but getting token reward if the other gets hurt, is intent to injure. I got it. Fantastic. And yes, Mike Smith, when asked specifically about the cleary illegal hits Dunta Robinson landed on defenseless players with the intent to injure them (why else would you land an illegal hit on a defenseless player) he responded "that is how we teach them". He is clearly stating he coaches players to land illegal hits on defenseless players with the intent to injure them. Yes, because offering payment for injuring other players is illegal? It's funny though your last paragraph. You're practically twisting yourself into a pretzel in an attempt to deflect here.
Radical Falcons Fan Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 148

10-11-2012, 09:23 AM	#6
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED Originally Posted by Radical Again, the defenseless receiver rule is impossible to coach for. What was Robinson supposed to do? I guess he could have let him take a few steps up field before making contact... but I don't think that would fly with anyone. Yes, because offering payment for injuring other players is illegal? It's funny though your last paragraph. You're practically twisting yourself into a pretzel in an attempt to deflect here. Here is where you are wrong. The Saints players were not offering money for injuring other players. They were offering money for big plays. If a player got hurt in the process it was not the intent, but simply part of the game. Players get hurt every game on exactly the same type of plays. The Saints were initially accused of intentionally targeting specific players for injury. They have all denied that and no proof has ever been presented that this ever occurred.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51771-nfl-re-issues-bounty-discipline-updated.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED	This thread	Refback	10-09-2012 04:38 PM	10
NFL re-issues bounty discipline	This thread	Refback	10-09-2012 03:35 PM	7

NFL re-issues bounty discipline**UPDATED**

NFL re-issues bounty disciplineUPDATED