New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Breaking News: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing (https://blackandgold.com/saints/52068-goodell-recuses-himself-bounty-appeal-hearing.html)

FinSaint 10-20-2012 10:42 AM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamessr (Post 450493)
Thats what I don't get.


Well, SP allegedly lied to Roger, which hurt his feelings and that made SP deserving of a season-long suspension.

Utah_Saint 10-20-2012 11:04 AM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Payton was suspended because there was a pay for performance program being run in the locker room, everyone admits that. The league told the Saints to stop it. Payton didn't stop it and told the investigators that he didn't know anything about it. The league provided an e-mail that was forwarded to him that said the sender would kick in to the pot.

So he's suspended for allowing the pay for performance program to continue and lying to investigators.

Whether Vilma, Fujita, Smith or Hargrove contributed money to or participated in the pool doesn't change what Sean's being punished for.

Now, that being said...an entire years suspension with the threat of more, is ridiculous when compared to a two game suspension for stomping on a player when he's laying on the playing field or using your helmet to try to remove the head of an opposing receiver or quarterback.

Tobias-Reiper 10-20-2012 11:44 AM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 450504)
Payton was suspended because there was a pay for performance program being run in the locker room, everyone admits that. The league told the Saints to stop it. Payton didn't stop it and told the investigators that he didn't know anything about it. The league provided an e-mail that was forwarded to him that said the sender would kick in to the pot.

So he's suspended for allowing the pay for performance program to continue and lying to investigators.

Whether Vilma, Fujita, Smith or Hargrove contributed money to or participated in the pool doesn't change what Sean's being punished for.

Now, that being said...an entire years suspension with the threat of more, is ridiculous when compared to a two game suspension for stomping on a player when he's laying on the playing field or using your helmet to try to remove the head of an opposing receiver or quarterback.

I think you got the Payton situation wrong.

When I think back to March and the announcement of the suspensions, the reports that came out where that Payton was "suspended for his involvement in a pay-to-injure program". The NFL could not have suspended Payton for a pay for performance program, as at worst it constitutes a salary cap violation, outside Goodell's jurisdiction, not punishable by suspensions.

As to what Payton said or didn't say, no one really knows. The only thing we do know, is that Payton issued a statement saying that, being the HC, he takes responsibility for "whatever happened" (paraphrasing). It was the media that speculated Payton lied to Goodell, and that was why he was suspended. But we don't know what the NFL asked Payton anything, or what was asked, or what is it that Payton actually said.

As to the allegations that the NFL warned the Saints about anything, no one in the Saints organization has acknowledged that actual warnings occurred, or how they were given, or to whom.

saintfan 10-20-2012 11:50 AM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Roger said specifically he suspended Sean and Loomie for "not doing enough" to stop the program.

I don't recall ever reading anything that insinuated they were trying to manipulate the NFL and continue the program, and Roger never said anything of the sort. He said it was for "not doing enough". What's enough?

Utah_Saint 10-20-2012 12:31 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 450507)
I think you got the Payton situation wrong.

When I think back to March and the announcement of the suspensions, the reports that came out where that Payton was "suspended for his involvement in a pay-to-injure program". The NFL could not have suspended Payton for a pay for performance program, as at worst it constitutes a salary cap violation, outside Goodell's jurisdiction, not punishable by suspensions.

As to what Payton said or didn't say, no one really knows. The only thing we do know, is that Payton issued a statement saying that, being the HC, he takes responsibility for "whatever happened" (paraphrasing). It was the media that speculated Payton lied to Goodell, and that was why he was suspended. But we don't know what the NFL asked Payton anything, or what was asked, or what is it that Payton actually said.

As to the allegations that the NFL warned the Saints about anything, no one in the Saints organization has acknowledged that actual warnings occurred, or how they were given, or to whom.

You're right.

It was "pay for injure" I should've written it that way because to us they aren't the same but I don't think anyone else recognizes that difference. All that's important to anyone is that there was money being given out when a player got knocked out of a game. Whether it was a legal hit doesn't make a difference to anyone or whether "knock outs" and "cart offs" were just a tiny part of a much bigger pool doesn't change what people think. Heck the fact that nobody even got injured from it, doesn't seem to change anything.

I don't know who got warned or what their response was, or more to the point what the league claims happened, but the league suspended Payton, Vitt, and Loomis for lying and encouraging the assistant coaches to also lie when he told them to "make sure our ducks are in a row". And lying when he claimed he was unaware of a bounty program.

But my point was that Payton is being punished for something different than what they're trying to hang on Vilma therefore I don't think that the outcome in Vilma's case will have much of a bearing on Payton's punishment.

Tobias-Reiper 10-20-2012 01:04 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 450510)
You're right.

It was "pay for injure" I should've written it that way because to us they aren't the same but I don't think anyone else recognizes that difference. All that's important to anyone is that there was money being given out when a player got knocked out of a game. Whether it was a legal hit doesn't make a difference to anyone or whether "knock outs" and "cart offs" were just a tiny part of a much bigger pool doesn't change what people think. Heck the fact that nobody even got injured from it, doesn't seem to change anything.

I don't know who got warned or what their response was, or more to the point what the league claims happened, but the league suspended Payton, Vitt, and Loomis for lying and encouraging the assistant coaches to also lie when he told them to "make sure our ducks are in a row". And lying when he claimed he was unaware of a bounty program.

But my point was that Payton is being punished for something different than what they're trying to hang on Vilma therefore I don't think that the outcome in Vilma's case will have much of a bearing on Payton's punishment.


That is what the media speculated. No one really knows what Payton's letter of suspension says, and I am assuming there has to be one.

Utah_Saint 10-20-2012 01:27 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 450511)
That is what the media speculated. No one really knows what Payton's letter of suspension says, and I am assuming there has to be one.

I just noticed that. I was looking for a statement from Goodell listing the infractions that Payton was being punished for. There's a difference between Goodell's statement, which is very vague, and press stories about the bounty program. It reads as if Payton is being punished for the specifics pointed out in the bounty stories back in March. Goodell said...

"A combination of elements made this matter particularly unusual and egregious, When there is targeting of players for injury and cash rewards over a three-year period, the involvement of the coaching staff, and three years of denials and willful disrespect of the rules, a strong and lasting message must be sent that such conduct is totally unacceptable and has no place in the game."

but does not specify who did what and exactly what the suspensions are for.

In the Payton/Loomis statement accepting the blame they say...

"We acknowledge that the violations disclosed by the NFL during their investigation of our club happened under our watch. We take full responsibility.

This has brought undue hardship on Mr. Benson, who had nothing to do with this activity. He has been nothing but supportive and for that we both apologize to him.

These are serious violations and we understand the negative impact it has had on our game. Both of us have made it clear within our organization that this will never happen again, and make that same promise to the NFL and most importantly to all of our fans."

That's about as vague as they could possibly be and still issue a statement. They didn't confess to anything. They only acknowledge that the accusations had been made and recognize the hardships caused by those accusations.

Beastmode 10-20-2012 01:44 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
What I kept thinking was what would happen come the SB if they didn' try to clean this thing up. I'm a mild mannered person but if I saw Roger on the otherside of the street I'd shout out some words to him for sure. It would be a nightmare for the NFL...the boos, the heckling...it would be impossible to hide it. The minute he stepped on the field it would not stop and it's not just because of the Saints either. He really needs to go away.

NonieT 10-20-2012 04:46 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Payton said he didn't lie and that's good enough for me. We all know Roger is a known liar. Just ask Jimmy Kennedy!

AsylumGuido 10-20-2012 05:51 PM

Re: Goodell recuses himself from bounty appeal hearing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NonieT (Post 450536)
Payton said he didn't lie and that's good enough for me. We all know Roger is a known liar. Just ask Jimmy Kennedy!

And this is the truth!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com