![]() |
Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
I read post after post how Vitt's return was going to motivate the team all the way to the Superbowl.
And I would always say I felt he was no different or better than Kromer. I personally believe shoving Kromer aside to shove Vitt in as Coach after Kromer was with the team for 6 weeks was a mistake. What a way to break up the little bit of chemistry the team developed over the prior 6 weeks. :rolleyes: Vitt was in command last night and the team looked lethargic and identical to some of the preseason games when they were lifeless with Vitt as head coach. Vitt didn't exactly do a great job as head coach last season when Sean Payton got hurt. The Tampa Bay game was full of stupid clock management. Don't even get me started on the Rams game. Just remember, there was a rush to bring Sean Payton back ASAP. Kromer grew up with the team in his 6 weeks and the past 2 weeks the team was animated and played with SOME heart. Last night was a joke. Not knocking Vitt, but to everyone who thinks he is some kind of savior, you were wrong. Now that Vitt is the head coach, it may take another few weeks for the team to come back to life, but it's too late to switch back to Kromer. Entire situation is a HOT ridiculous mess. But seriously, I have no idea what the linebackers coach (Vitt) was going to do different than the o-line coach (Kromer) at the helm. Being a head coach is a lot more than just funny press conferences and tough talk (just ask Jet fans and they'll tell you why Rex Ryan stinks). It sucks because Kromer was just coming into his own ONLY to be interrupted by Vitt. |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Quote:
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Quote:
But taking Kromer out on a 2 game win streak was dumb. They were just starting to play normal ball - Kromer found an angle. This is not like swapping a hard drive out on a computer or swapping a motor out on a car. Coaching is 1000000 times more complicated. |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Quote:
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
I hear ya. I guess my roundabout point was, he is hardly a good coach and he has been out for 6 weeks of football. Then he comes in and is calling the plays?? I don't expect you to agree with my feelings on Vitt but IMO he has done nothing and its blown up 10 fold this year because Payton is not here.
I agree totally about Kromer. As crappy as we started out, we could see some progress and each game got a little better. Mr. big bad bossman comes back and he just starts taking over sh!t and our team played worse than it had all season. Coincidence? |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
God help us ... we're the first team in NFL history with a coach controversy :(. Thanks Goodell!
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
I didn't think he would be the answer to begin with. Need Payton back.
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
There has been only one constant between our two coaches: the sorry-ass players on the field. We're plagued by bad play, simple as that.
This defense needs to be blown-up with an atom bomb. No offense can survive the worse defense in league history. |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
I hate Roger Goodell
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Makes sense, in hockey you ride a hot-goalie until he burns out, why wouldn't you stick with a coach that's winning?
I thought maybe the return of Vitt would continue the momentum gained under Kromer, but I guess having to adjust to yet another coaching change was a little too much for the team ... <sigh> ... <whew>. |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
There is no answer this is the punishment everyone connected to the Saints is going to suffer this season. There is a reason why successful head coachs are where they are.
This is just a roller coaster ride, the good news is it will be over soon unless you fall off. |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Has anybody else noticed that our LB'ers consistently suck? Now, who is our LB'er coach? Oh yeah, some guy named Joe Vitt.
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
If nothing else I was hoping it would allow Kromer to focus more on the o-line and our run game and improve blocking and protection there while allowing for a more experienced hand in clock management decisions and situational game decisions. Some may be right about taking the reigns away from the hot hand but frankly we were lucky to win versus San Diego and Tampa Bay and I don't think even a decent effort would have matched Denver on Sunday.
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Quote:
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
The one step in the right direction --->
I did not see ONE Scott Shanle walk-by all night!!! WOO HOO !!!! Small victories are victories nonetheless. Alaska |
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
I believe both guys (Kromer and Vitt) were dealt an incredibly bad hand. Neither guy was put into a situation where they can succeed. With that said, for better or worse, I think the Saints organization fumbled this one big time. I get that Vitt is second in charge, but seriously, when Vitt got handed that 6 game suspension the reins should have been handed over to Kromer for the entire season, should have been end of story. Believe me, even when Kromer was on that 0-4 streak I felt the same as I do now.
|
Re: Vitt wasn't going to be the answer
Lets see how we do against the eagles before throwing Vitt under the bus. This game was in Denver against a team coming off a bye week and please look at Manning teams' results coming off a bye.................
2010 Blowout win at home against texans 2009 Blowout win in St.Louis 2008 Rusty from bursa sac removal surgery, but came back against texans on the road 2007 blowout win in Jacksonville in primetime 2006 blowout win against redskins, but let them score late to make the game closer than it was. 2005 blowout win in NEW ENGLAND Those results speak for itself. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com