Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Safety position - Bush and Quddus

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by papz True. If Freeman didn't suck so bad, the opportunities were there for Tampa... they just couldn't capitalize. With that said, 0 is 0... hopefully we build on this performance finishing strong and into the off season. ...

Like Tree9Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2012, 04:59 PM   #11
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by papz View Post
True. If Freeman didn't suck so bad, the opportunities were there for Tampa... they just couldn't capitalize. With that said, 0 is 0... hopefully we build on this performance finishing strong and into the off season.

Watch out NFL, the 2013 Saints will have a big chip on their shoulder.

Motto for next year should be TAKE NO PRISONERS.
So true, I was watching several plays that I thought to myself "if that was Harper or Jenkins the haters would have been all over them on that play".

They looked good, but certainly no better than Jenkins and Harper. The good news is it appears we have 4 capable safeties already on the roster.

I just can't believe the over-reaction to a couple highlight plays. It was one game. We played the same 3 last week as Eli torched us for 4 TD's.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 05:11 PM   #12
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mid City, New Orleans
Posts: 3,556
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
So true, I was watching several plays that I thought to myself "if that was Harper or Jenkins the haters would have been all over them on that play".

They looked good, but certainly no better than Jenkins and Harper. The good news is it appears we have 4 capable safeties already on the roster.

I just can't believe the over-reaction to a couple highlight plays. It was one game. We played the same 3 last week as Eli torched us for 4 TD's.
In defense of my hate for Jenkins, I didn't get to see the game, only listen to it on the radio. Stuck working today, so there is one haters excuse
CharityMike is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 05:16 PM   #13
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 92
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Not to take anything away from either of them, but 3 of the four interceptions, were TERRIBLE throws by freeman. de la Puente could've made those interceptions.
Kristomac is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 05:22 PM   #14
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Kristomac View Post
Not to take anything away from either of them, but 3 of the four interceptions, were TERRIBLE throws by freeman. de la Puente could've made those interceptions.
Bush wasn't within 10 yards of a Buc receiver on his pick.

I like them both, especially Quddus, but lets not get carried away.
foreverfan and Rell&Gold like this.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 05:53 PM   #15
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,887
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
So true, I was watching several plays that I thought to myself "if that was Harper or Jenkins the haters would have been all over them on that play".

They looked good, but certainly no better than Jenkins and Harper. The good news is it appears we have 4 capable safeties already on the roster.

I just can't believe the over-reaction to a couple highlight plays. It was one game. We played the same 3 last week as Eli torched us for 4 TD's.
All four were the corners fault
Rell&Gold is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 05:58 PM   #16
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Rell&Gold View Post
All four were the corners fault
You're missing the point.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 06:08 PM   #17
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,887
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Isa&Bush did give up alot of 15 and 20 yarder's today...But no TD's but they did abandon the run with that said Freemans Completion % wasnt good they had 6 passing plays for 15 yards or more and 3 of those were 20 or more so yea they played lil better but nothing to celebrate about...But without a doubt Isa is around the ball more than Jenkins
Rell&Gold is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 06:10 PM   #18
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,887
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Bush wasn't within 10 yards of a Buc receiver on his pick.

I like them both, especially Quddus, but lets not get carried away.
agreed
Rell&Gold is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 06:15 PM   #19
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,887
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
You're missing the point.
Dont think so They gave up no Passing TD's regardless of how it was done it was impressive...They Gave up no TD period for that matter But they did still give up "THOSE" plays Just like 27&41...so lets just wait and see
Rell&Gold is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 08:30 PM   #20
500th Post
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: born And raised in NOLA, now live in Los Angeles
Posts: 811
Re: Safety position - Bush and Quddus

Jenkins could be the big physical corner we've needed, with Bush and Q looking good.
lsutigerfan is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/53812-safety-position-bush-quddus.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Safety position - Bush and Quddus This thread Refback 12-16-2012 04:56 PM 2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-16-2012 04:43 PM 5


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts