Receivers five or six?

CheramieIII · 08-23-2004, 08:50 PM

I think we will definetly keep at least 6 receivers on the roster and maybe 1 on the ps:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...aints/home.htm

Euphoria · 08-24-2004, 02:28 AM

yeah, I don\'t know how this is going to play out but either Black or Lewis will go to the practice squad. Gardner is gone to inconsistant and I haven\'t seen him impress me in camp. Black has and D. Lewis has a bit more speed. Nathan Black will complement out wr corps. as a posesion type WR.

Danno · 08-24-2004, 07:42 AM

I read that Gardner can\'t be placed on the PS so it looks like these 6...

Horn
Stall
Pathon
Henderson
M.Lewis
Gardner

Practice squad...
Black
Cook

How about a trade for a back-up CB now that Craver\'s history?
It would probably have to be Pathon. He\'s the only one with enough trade value to get a good CB. Derrick Lewis then makes the team as #6.

Euphoria · 08-24-2004, 10:55 AM

also they have to clear waivers... I don\'t think D. Lewis will clear waivers without someone picking him up. Black may slip under the radar but I wounldn\'t risk it. I would rather cut Gardner he really hasn\'t had a good camp and no improvement from last year. He has a good number of drops in camp.

pakowitz · 08-24-2004, 11:16 AM

actually i believe that the reciever with the most trade potential is gardener the guy has size speed is only in his 2nd season and has a world of potential... most teams look for guys like him and if he was released or placed on PS he would be picked up in a heartbeat... so that also tells me that he would have good trade value

Danno · 08-24-2004, 01:03 PM

Gardner\'s not eligible for the PS.
But you are right. There probably are GM\'s that have their eye on this kid.
I\'d hate to give up on him but we have an excess at WR and a deficit at LB/CB.
Who needs a WR that has an excess of CB\'s and LB\'s...
Ravens???

GumboBC · 08-24-2004, 01:23 PM

Player for player trades are pretty rare. And those times it usually does happen, it\'s usually higher profile guys.

I\'ll betcha not too many GMs have their eye on Gardner. I don\'t know why they would. At least not any more than a lot of other wideouts that haven\'t proved too much around the NFL.

Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him.

saintz08 · 08-24-2004, 02:32 PM

Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him.

As GM I am going to bury my nose in the Redskins , Rams and Chiefs rosters and wait for someone too fall through the cracks .

Danno · 08-24-2004, 03:22 PM

I\'ll betcha not too many GMs have their eye on Gardner. I don\'t know why they would. At least not any more than a lot of other wideouts that haven\'t proved too much around the NFL.
Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him.

I never said they\'d be chomping at the bit, but I\'ll bet he wouldn\'t clear waivers.

You\'d think I suggested trading Gardner for Ray Lewis. :casstet:

GumboBC · 08-24-2004, 03:47 PM

I never said they\'d be chomping at the bit, but I\'ll bet he wouldn\'t clear waivers.

You\'d think I suggested trading Gardner for Ray Lewis.

Nah, I knew you weren\'t suggesting anything like that Danno. I just have my doubts that we could trade Gardner for anyone that\'s worth much. I think there will be a lot of guys that will clear waviers that will catch on with other NFL clubs who are as talented as Gardner. To be honest, I don\'t know how talented the kid is.

08-23-2004, 08:50 PM	#1
CheramieIII Fan Since 1967 Join Date: May 2004 Location: Nomad Posts: 7,487 Blog Entries: 3	Receivers five or six? I think we will definetly keep at least 6 receivers on the roster and maybe 1 on the ps: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...aints/home.htm

08-24-2004, 02:28 AM	#2
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Receivers five or six? yeah, I don\'t know how this is going to play out but either Black or Lewis will go to the practice squad. Gardner is gone to inconsistant and I haven\'t seen him impress me in camp. Black has and D. Lewis has a bit more speed. Nathan Black will complement out wr corps. as a posesion type WR.

08-24-2004, 07:42 AM	#3
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	Receivers five or six? I read that Gardner can\'t be placed on the PS so it looks like these 6... Horn Stall Pathon Henderson M.Lewis Gardner Practice squad... Black Cook How about a trade for a back-up CB now that Craver\'s history? It would probably have to be Pathon. He\'s the only one with enough trade value to get a good CB. Derrick Lewis then makes the team as #6.

08-24-2004, 10:55 AM	#4
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Receivers five or six? also they have to clear waivers... I don\'t think D. Lewis will clear waivers without someone picking him up. Black may slip under the radar but I wounldn\'t risk it. I would rather cut Gardner he really hasn\'t had a good camp and no improvement from last year. He has a good number of drops in camp.

08-24-2004, 11:16 AM	#5
pakowitz The Dark Overlord Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: dirty south Posts: 3,450	Receivers five or six? actually i believe that the reciever with the most trade potential is gardener the guy has size speed is only in his 2nd season and has a world of potential... most teams look for guys like him and if he was released or placed on PS he would be picked up in a heartbeat... so that also tells me that he would have good trade value

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

08-24-2004, 01:03 PM	#6
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	Receivers five or six? Gardner\'s not eligible for the PS. But you are right. There probably are GM\'s that have their eye on this kid. I\'d hate to give up on him but we have an excess at WR and a deficit at LB/CB. Who needs a WR that has an excess of CB\'s and LB\'s... Ravens???

08-24-2004, 01:23 PM	#7
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616	Receivers five or six? Player for player trades are pretty rare. And those times it usually does happen, it\'s usually higher profile guys. I\'ll betcha not too many GMs have their eye on Gardner. I don\'t know why they would. At least not any more than a lot of other wideouts that haven\'t proved too much around the NFL. Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him.
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616

08-24-2004, 02:32 PM	#8
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020	Receivers five or six? Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him. As GM I am going to bury my nose in the Redskins , Rams and Chiefs rosters and wait for someone too fall through the cracks .
saintz08 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,020

08-24-2004, 03:22 PM	#9
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	Receivers five or six? I\'ll betcha not too many GMs have their eye on Gardner. I don\'t know why they would. At least not any more than a lot of other wideouts that haven\'t proved too much around the NFL. Let me ask you this: If you were a GM would you be chomping at the bit to sign Garder? I wouldn\'t. And I wouldn\'t be expecting much out of him if I did sign him. I never said they\'d be chomping at the bit, but I\'ll bet he wouldn\'t clear waivers. You\'d think I suggested trading Gardner for Ray Lewis. :casstet:

08-24-2004, 03:47 PM	#10
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616	Receivers five or six? I never said they\'d be chomping at the bit, but I\'ll bet he wouldn\'t clear waivers. You\'d think I suggested trading Gardner for Ray Lewis. Nah, I knew you weren\'t suggesting anything like that Danno. I just have my doubts that we could trade Gardner for anyone that\'s worth much. I think there will be a lot of guys that will clear waviers that will catch on with other NFL clubs who are as talented as Gardner. To be honest, I don\'t know how talented the kid is.
GumboBC Banned Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 2,616