![]() |
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
NAH ON WELKER... Danny Amendola is a DOG THO !!! He is a beast !
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
You can tell our season sucked, my brother called me two days ago talking about watching the combine!!! We're more than ready!
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Welker moore colston as the starting 3 wr? sick totally sick. go into 4 wr set with graham, pt and sproils on the field at the same time?
oh baby i would love to hear the DC trying to stop that setup. lmao and loving it ok pipe dream over. money aint there |
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
No, not really.
|
I'd rather spend the money on a good LT/CB/OLB
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Isn't Sproles our scat back guy taking small screens, dumps, and wheels and moving within the defense to pick up yards?!?
I much prefer how we do it and spread the money amongst several players... |
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Quote:
I'd even replace our running backs with AP. Why stop there.. I'd like to get peyton Manning for a year... and replace JG with gronk... and replace .... Why? Offense is good enough! |
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Not to be negative but after this past season a lot of teams will be focusing on Moore next season when they see the tapes in offseason. Which does concern me a little as how does Moore play under an even bigger spotlight than he may have already was. I mean its hard for defenses to cover all three targets of Brees' biggest receivers, but Moore had the best year this season. And Graham's 2011 will not be forgotten. i think Colston is the one thats going to need to step up as well as Morgan and Sproles. I worry though Colston is due to get hurt. He hasnt missed games since the playoff game in 2010.
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Yes he would be fun to hang out with. We don't have a roster spot for him though!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com