|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; There's no $$$ at all for this and if there was I'd still rather it be spent on the D, but wouldn't Welker in the slot and Sproles running out the other side be fun to watch? That's not even ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-18-2013, 03:41 PM | #1 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
|
Wouldn't Welker be fun?
There's no $$$ at all for this and if there was I'd still rather it be spent on the D, but wouldn't Welker in the slot and Sproles running out the other side be fun to watch? That's not even mentioning everyone else we have. Teams'd need twelve men on the field just to try to cover everything.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
02-18-2013, 03:42 PM | #2 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
So replace Lance Moore with Welker?
|
02-18-2013, 04:29 PM | #3 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
No, two's better than one. Remember, this is a just thinkin' about it thread. By 2014 the downsides would outweigh the up, but I'm just thinkin' it would be plain fun to see Welker and Brees and the rest on the same team just once.
|
02-18-2013, 04:31 PM | #4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston
Posts: 2,089
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
|
02-18-2013, 04:42 PM | #5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Welker is good but with a lesser QB...I don't see it.
|
02-18-2013, 04:46 PM | #6 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Originally Posted by alleycat_126
Jennings would be the bomb. he can get yacs like no one else.its almost imposible to get gennings without money. It would be fun
. |
02-18-2013, 07:12 PM | #7 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
I see Welker as a bit quicker and much craftier at getting open, but heck with him. How about Megatron?
|
02-18-2013, 07:17 PM | #8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,208
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Welker drops the big time catches that need to be made, lance moore doesnt
Greg jennings would be perfect for our offense but someone would see a very reduced role and we are already loaded up to the eye balls in offensive talent Dont forget that nick toon will be back this year and if he stays healthy, he could turn into a very reliable option |
02-18-2013, 07:24 PM | #9 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,720
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
I think a player like Ngata, Aldon Smith, Patrick Willis or Clay Matthews would be much much more fun.
|
02-18-2013, 07:36 PM | #10 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
|
Re: Wouldn't Welker be fun?
Man, nine posts into this silly thread....Are we ready for some football or what?
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/55590-wouldnt-welker-fun.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 02-18-2013 06:06 PM | 2 |
Wouldn't Welker be fun? | This thread | Refback | 02-18-2013 04:08 PM | 38 |