Daniel Tweet on FA

The Dude · 03-11-2013, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by Jamessr

Teams that can use him NOW!

1. Arizona
2. Dallas
3. Cleveland
4. Philly
5. San Diego (yes he can beat out Rivers)
6. Oakland (yes he can beat out Palmer)
7. Jacksonville

On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know.

Danno · 03-11-2013, 04:52 PM

Originally Posted by The Dude

On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know.

Can you tell the difference between these two statements?

1-I think he can be a starter somewhere.
2-He will never be a starter anywhere.

Jamessr · 03-11-2013, 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by The Dude

On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know.

For starters have you seen the QB situation in Arizona? Anyone would be an upgrade.

03-11-2013, 04:32 PM	#1
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,055	Re: Daniel Tweet on FA Originally Posted by Jamessr Teams that can use him NOW! 1. Arizona 2. Dallas 3. Cleveland 4. Philly 5. San Diego (yes he can beat out Rivers) 6. Oakland (yes he can beat out Palmer) 7. Jacksonville On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,055

03-11-2013, 04:52 PM	#2
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,748	Re: Daniel Tweet on FA Originally Posted by The Dude On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know. Can you tell the difference between these two statements? 1-I think he can be a starter somewhere. 2-He will never be a starter anywhere.

03-11-2013, 05:27 PM	#3
Jamessr 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Newport News, VA Posts: 1,583	Re: Daniel Tweet on FA Originally Posted by The Dude On what basis do you say this? We have not seen him play enough to know he can beat out Rivers, Palmer, and Romo, who are all decent QBs and long time starters in this league just on ****ty teams. If he could "beat them out" someone would have tried to trade us for him by now. People always say stuff like "He's going to be a starter somewhere and He's the next Drew Brees, and when someone says he's not they say "Why would you say he won't be a starter we have not seen him play" Well the same thing could be said to people who are so sure he's going to start and be a great QB. We just don't know. For starters have you seen the QB situation in Arizona? Anyone would be an upgrade.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/56048-daniel-tweet-fa.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Daniel Tweet on FA	This thread	Refback	03-09-2013 08:06 AM	28
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	03-08-2013 07:28 PM	1