|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I\'m not really concerned about the fumble. Deuce was just trying to get more yards. The problem was that he was hit 1 or 2 yards in the backfield on a 3rd&1 AGAIN. It\'s becoming clearer and clearer that McCarthy ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-15-2004, 11:11 AM | #11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here)
Posts: 1,704
|
A Brooks answer
I\'m not really concerned about the fumble. Deuce was just trying to get more yards. The problem was that he was hit 1 or 2 yards in the backfield on a 3rd&1 AGAIN.
It\'s becoming clearer and clearer that McCarthy has no real understanding of his own offense. It seems as though he has simply stolen someone else\'s playbook and is trying to pass it off as his own. He sucks at game planning, at halftime adjustments, at play calling, and at evaluating his own offense\'s strengths. I\'m really becoming surprised they\'ve ever scored under McCarthy\'s leadership. All that said and I\'d still rather have McCarthy over Carl Smith. [Edited on 15/9/2004 by ScottyRo] |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
09-15-2004, 04:01 PM | #12 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS
Posts: 4,100
|
A Brooks answer
WhoDat,WhoDat,WhoDat when are you going to learn? These guys just sit and wait for you to say something. They\'re like wolves on the lamb. LMAO!!! :P
|
09-16-2004, 06:44 AM | #14 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
A Brooks answer
Brooks is a loser....how long is it going to take for the coaching staff and owner to realize this... or, is it possible that they have already realized it, but are forced to let him play to justify his huge contract. Whatever, the fans come out huge losers, too, because they keep getting force-fed this crap and it seems to be a nightmare that keeps repeating itself.
|
09-16-2004, 10:14 AM | #15 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,773
|
A Brooks answer
Just look at the stats. Let\'s flip the question. Why is it always Brooks that\'s the loser? Let\'s take another example: Deuce McAllister. He\'s been on the team one less year than Brooks. He\'s been ultra productive in the last 2 years. He\'s disappeared in games especially in the late season swoons of the Saints of late. Yet no one is calling for his head. Can someone explain that to me? Why isn\'t he labeled a loser? Why isn\'t he labeled a non leader because he isn\'t fired up on the sideline and in the locker room? Why are there not calls for him to be traded for a LB and a CB? What\'s the difference? I\'d really like to know. Note that Deuce didn\'t get not one 100 yard game in the last 4 games of last year.
But it defies logic. So they settle on an emotional response: \"He\'s a loser.\", \"He smiles too much.\", \"He\'s not a leader.\", \"He\'s too laid back.\", \"He doesn\'t get fired up.\", \"He doesn\'t get upset when the team is losing, so he must like losing.\" I\'ll put it simply. If emotion really won football games then the Saints should be working on their 4th consecutive title, because Haslett is the most fired up, emotional, get upset, tortured coach in the league. So the Saints should have a 80 game winning streak because if you\'re fired up, you can win. Yeah. Right. The best coaches in the league right now is the innovative, methodical thinker that doesn\'t get too up and too down: Belichik (sp) and his two coordinators. Same for QBs. Farve should have 10 titles now. He doesn\'t. Why? I\'m tired now. Tired of arguing. So I\'ll simple trot out the tired old quote of mine: \"Brooks\' attitude in unsuitable for an NFL QB in many fans\' minds.\" SFIAH [Edited on 16/9/2004 by SaintFanInATLHELL] |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
09-16-2004, 11:42 AM | #16 |
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 182
|
A Brooks answer
You make a good point but...don\'t you ever wonder why Brooks almost never calls audibles at the line of scrimmage? And the odd time when he does, it rarely is successful? Let\'s face it, the man is no Einstein. Brooks may indeed have made a simple mistake with the blocking scheme. However, he could have changed up the play at the line. For whatever reason he didn\'t. Brooks has shown year after year now that athleticism alone is not enough to get the job done. His lack of leadership skills is bad enough but an inability to think quickly under pressure-like when the NFL switches off the helmet speaker-doesn\'t reinforce his teammates\' faith in him. He showed us all a fundemental lack of smarts when he announced he didn\'t want to be known as a scrambling QB. Why bother telling the rest of the NFL \"I want to be a statue back there\" when the threat of running was such a potent weapon. No one has ever asked Brooks that question and until someone does I\'m gonna continue to think there\'s not a whole lot goin\' on up there... |
09-16-2004, 11:58 AM | #17 |
Donated Plasma
|
A Brooks answer
On a semi-related note, I\'m sure you watched the Green Bay / Carolina game on Monday night. Did you notice how successful the Panthers were running the screen. Was this because Farve can\'t throw one in practice and thus the Green Bay defense is unable to learn how to defend it? Just curious...and all in fun of course. |
09-16-2004, 12:03 PM | #18 |
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
A Brooks answer
what?
|
09-16-2004, 12:07 PM | #19 |
Donated Plasma
|
A Brooks answer
Does 1=1 and 2=2 or not? :P |
09-16-2004, 02:00 PM | #20 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
A Brooks answer
I believe that the equation you\'re looking for is:
If a=c and b=c then a=b... You never were good at math, just look at your interpretation of Brooks\' statistics! |