Ingram - rumors along with everything else

Danno · 08-31-2013, 08:43 PM

6 ILBs and 3 OLBs is a headscratcher. Obviously we haven't finished finalizing our 53.

dizzle88 · 09-01-2013, 05:15 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

6 ILBs and 3 OLBs is a headscratcher. Obviously we haven't finished finalizing our 53.

I hope your right, TP reporters are convinced this means we will be running 4-3 again more than 3-4

westbankdaze · 09-01-2013, 07:36 AM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

I hope your right, TP reporters are convinced this means we will be running 4-3 again more than 3-4

Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now.

Danno · 09-01-2013, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by westbankdaze

Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now.

Its been documented that we're gonna run both. The 3-4 will be our base set, which Ryan said we'll run less than 50% of the time.

Its true we have more d-line talent now, but I think it still fits a 3-4 better.

Jordan, Bunkley, Hicks, JJenkins, Foster all look better suited for a 3-4. Lofton and Vilma now appear a step too slow to play that 4-3MLB and would probably benefit from splitting the field.

jeanpierre · 09-01-2013, 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

Its been documented that we're gonna run both. The 3-4 will be our base set, which Ryan said we'll run less than 50% of the time.

Its true we have more d-line talent now, but I think it still fits a 3-4 better.

Jordan, Bunkley, Hicks, JJenkins, Foster all look better suited for a 3-4. Lofton and Vilma now appear a step too slow to play that 4-3MLB and would probably benefit from splitting the field.

It's easier finding 34 Defensive Linemen (though what we have in both Bunkley and Jenkins is rare) than finding four dynamic linemen (really need a rotation of six)...

Dead on about splitting the middle of the field for the MLB, though i've concerns about them engaging/disengaging "active" offensive guards...

But how we didn't draft and make moves to acquire at least one-two more OLB (i.e. Alec Ogletree, Jaime Collins, Jarvis Jones) when transitioning to a 34 is beyond me...

Though I've been a big critic, I didn't like seeing Will Smith injured (though I won a pool that he wouldn't start Week 1) and would have liked him back at DE rotating with Cam Jordan at the 5-tech...

Unless it were someone young like Alec Ogletree or an unsuspended Von Miller, I really don't want to see Ingram geaux not having a proven MotorBack to convert those short yardage gains for us...

spkb25 · 08-31-2013, 09:35 PM

we can afford to trade him. i'd pull the trigger. dude does look faster n he'd probably be good somewhere they'd feed him the rock 20+ times

DISPLACEDFAN · 09-01-2013, 12:06 AM

https://twitter.com/DConnollyNFL

this guy is from Atlanta so I'd doubt anything he had to say when it came from him about the saints. I'm living here in New York and ive heard absolutely nothing on this at all not even a mention on any this so relax this is Just a Atlanta fan trying to get in your head

westbankdaze · 09-01-2013, 07:34 AM

We keep 5 RB?? No way - Ingram looks to be on the plans for a trade ! I like the idea alot!

SaintsBro · 09-01-2013, 08:02 AM

Originally Posted by westbankdaze

Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now.

Didn't you know, there is only one opinion allowed on this forum... I am sure you will be told to "quit yammering" and will be educated shortly.

blackangold · 09-01-2013, 10:43 AM

Why sign Haralson if we plan to go back to a 43...

The times we have run a 43 in the preseason we got beat all day long. Our best line-up now is suited for the 34. When Wilson and Galette finally hit the field against ATL we will surprise a lot of teams, hell from what I have heard about Haralson he could be a pro-bowler.

In the preseason we had the 2nd ranked run D, and the 8th ranked total D. Consider we did that without our 3 best OLBs on the field, but keep letting the media and others focus on last year... CANT WAIT!

08-31-2013, 08:43 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,751	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR 6 ILBs and 3 OLBs is a headscratcher. Obviously we haven't finished finalizing our 53. spkb25 and dizzle88 like this.

09-01-2013, 05:15 AM	#2
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,521	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Originally Posted by Danno 6 ILBs and 3 OLBs is a headscratcher. Obviously we haven't finished finalizing our 53. I hope your right, TP reporters are convinced this means we will be running 4-3 again more than 3-4

09-01-2013, 07:36 AM	#3
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Originally Posted by dizzle88 I hope your right, TP reporters are convinced this means we will be running 4-3 again more than 3-4 Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now.
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843

09-01-2013, 09:17 AM	#4
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,751	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Originally Posted by westbankdaze Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now. Its been documented that we're gonna run both. The 3-4 will be our base set, which Ryan said we'll run less than 50% of the time. Its true we have more d-line talent now, but I think it still fits a 3-4 better. Jordan, Bunkley, Hicks, JJenkins, Foster all look better suited for a 3-4. Lofton and Vilma now appear a step too slow to play that 4-3MLB and would probably benefit from splitting the field. saintfan and jeanpierre like this.

09-01-2013, 10:54 AM	#5
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Originally Posted by Danno Its been documented that we're gonna run both. The 3-4 will be our base set, which Ryan said we'll run less than 50% of the time. Its true we have more d-line talent now, but I think it still fits a 3-4 better. Jordan, Bunkley, Hicks, JJenkins, Foster all look better suited for a 3-4. Lofton and Vilma now appear a step too slow to play that 4-3MLB and would probably benefit from splitting the field. It's easier finding 34 Defensive Linemen (though what we have in both Bunkley and Jenkins is rare) than finding four dynamic linemen (really need a rotation of six)... Dead on about splitting the middle of the field for the MLB, though i've concerns about them engaging/disengaging "active" offensive guards... But how we didn't draft and make moves to acquire at least one-two more OLB (i.e. Alec Ogletree, Jaime Collins, Jarvis Jones) when transitioning to a 34 is beyond me... Though I've been a big critic, I didn't like seeing Will Smith injured (though I won a pool that he wouldn't start Week 1) and would have liked him back at DE rotating with Cam Jordan at the 5-tech... Unless it were someone young like Alec Ogletree or an unsuspended Von Miller, I really don't want to see Ingram geaux not having a proven MotorBack to convert those short yardage gains for us...
	It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...

08-31-2013, 09:35 PM	#6
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,120	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR we can afford to trade him. i'd pull the trigger. dude does look faster n he'd probably be good somewhere they'd feed him the rock 20+ times

09-01-2013, 12:06 AM	#7
DISPLACEDFAN 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: corning,ny Posts: 518	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR https://twitter.com/DConnollyNFL this guy is from Atlanta so I'd doubt anything he had to say when it came from him about the saints. I'm living here in New York and ive heard absolutely nothing on this at all not even a mention on any this so relax this is Just a Atlanta fan trying to get in your head

09-01-2013, 07:34 AM	#8
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR We keep 5 RB?? No way - Ingram looks to be on the plans for a trade ! I like the idea alot!
westbankdaze 500th Post Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 843

09-01-2013, 08:02 AM	#9
SaintsBro Site Donor Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG Posts: 3,650 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Originally Posted by westbankdaze Guys on this forum scoffed at me when I suggested we should go back to a 4-3 now that we have so much talent on the DL. I see Larry Holder tweeting the same thing now. Didn't you know, there is only one opinion allowed on this forum... I am sure you will be told to "quit yammering" and will be educated shortly.

09-01-2013, 10:43 AM	#10
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR Why sign Haralson if we plan to go back to a 43... The times we have run a 43 in the preseason we got beat all day long. Our best line-up now is suited for the 34. When Wilson and Galette finally hit the field against ATL we will surprise a lot of teams, hell from what I have heard about Haralson he could be a pro-bowler. In the preseason we had the 2nd ranked run D, and the 8th ranked total D. Consider we did that without our 3 best OLBs on the field, but keep letting the media and others focus on last year... CANT WAIT!

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/59885-ingram-rumors-along-everything-else.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Ingram - rumors along with everything else	This thread	Refback	09-27-2013 09:45 AM	34
The Latest Mark Ingram News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	09-02-2013 07:56 AM	1
Untitled document	This thread	Refback	08-30-2013 03:20 PM	1
Cbox	This thread	Refback	08-30-2013 03:16 PM	2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-30-2013 03:04 PM	20
Interesting RUMOR: Giants-Saints in Ingram trade talks - RUMOR	This thread	Refback	08-30-2013 02:31 PM	193