New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Khiry Robinson runs nasty (https://blackandgold.com/saints/60538-khiry-robinson-runs-nasty.html)

blackangold 09-24-2013 01:35 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Video of him...

Runs hard and is great catching balls out of the backfield. If he can stay healthy we have a diamond in the rough here.


Utah_Saint 09-24-2013 01:50 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Budsdrinker (Post 531652)
But do you have the stats on what personnel the defenses were playing? That's what most of us are missing out on. I'm willing to bet the first beer that Ingram faces more base defense with the front 7 made up of DL and LB's and also a safety in the box compared to the rest facing nickle and dime packages that employ more smaller DB's.

Nope, I don't have that info.

I'd be willing to bet your right.

TheOak 09-24-2013 02:17 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Ok so he gets more base defense... Settled.

What do we do? Get a RB that can get it done regardless or ask the opponent to not run Base Defense with 7 man front? Don't run at all if we see 7 up front?

I prefer to think he had an aggravated injury than he is rather useless against a seven man front. .

Utah_Saint 09-24-2013 03:21 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Budsdrinker (Post 531652)
But do you have the stats on what personnel the defenses were playing? That's what most of us are missing out on. I'm willing to bet the first beer that Ingram faces more base defense with the front 7 made up of DL and LB's and also a safety in the box compared to the rest facing nickle and dime packages that employ more smaller DB's.

Last season Ingram lined up for 268 offensive snaps. Of those he rushed the ball 156 times. That's 58% of the time he came off the bench, he rushed the ball. That's the highest percentage in the NFL (of the 59 half backs with over 200 carries). Other than Ingram, only Stevan Ridley of the Patriots was over 50%.

Rush/Snap %
1 Mark Ingram 58.2%
2 Stevan Ridley 51.8%
3 Jammal Charles 47.9%
4 Bernard Pierce 47.6%
5 Shonn Green 47.3%

The league average was 34% for that same set of backs.

More than any other back in the NFL, if Mark Ingram was in, the play was likely to be a run. And with those kinds of percentages, it's logical to assume that defenses were told to play the run whenever number 28 was on the field.

(posted back in June)

Boutte 09-24-2013 04:32 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
I just don't understand how anybody can have watched Ingram for two years and sees anything more than an average (at best) RB.

And the "every time he comes it's a run" arguement goes right out the window when look at what Ivory did when given a chance because it was the same situation for him.

Jack Vegas 09-24-2013 04:35 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boutte (Post 531697)
And the "every time he comes it's a run" arguement goes right out the window when look at what Ivory did when given a chance because it was the same situation for him.

Even moreso. The percentage of rushing plays when Ivory was in the game was something like 8 percent higher than Ingram, IIRC. There was a very good thread about this on Footballguys or Rotoworld a while back, illuminating stuff.

TheOak 09-24-2013 04:40 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint (Post 531681)
Last season Ingram lined up for 268 offensive snaps. Of those he rushed the ball 156 times. That's 58% of the time he came off the bench, he rushed the ball. That's the highest percentage in the NFL (of the 59 half backs with over 200 carries). Other than Ingram, only Stevan Ridley of the Patriots was over 50%.

Rush/Snap %
1 Mark Ingram 58.2%
2 Stevan Ridley 51.8%
3 Jammal Charles 47.9%
4 Bernard Pierce 47.6%
5 Shonn Green 47.3%

The league average was 34% for that same set of backs.

More than any other back in the NFL, if Mark Ingram was in, the play was likely to be a run. And with those kinds of percentages, it's logical to assume that defenses were told to play the run whenever number 28 was on the field.

(posted back in June)

That is what happens when that is all you can do. Should we let him punt?

Jack Vegas 09-24-2013 05:01 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
The thread I mentioned earlier: Saints use of Mark Ingram borders on criminal - Page 3 - The Shark Pool (NFL Talk) - Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Highlights:

Not a pretty picture... top 10 carries/snaps for RB with more than 18 snaps + Ingram @ 18
Snps Carries PCT YPC
mathews 20 13 0.650 2.5
cj2k 43 25 0.581 2.8
williams 31 17 0.548 5.1
f jax 26 13 0.500 5.2
ingram 18 9 0.500 1.2
mccoy 65 31 0.477 5.9
spiller 37 17 0.459 2.4
mendenhall 35 16 0.457 3.8
tate 20 9 0.450 6.1
charles 36 16 0.444 4.8


For his career, Ivory is averaging an astonishing 5.1 yards per carry (compared to the 3.9 of Ingram) despite the fact that when he's in the game it's a telltale sign the Saints are running (74.9 percent of his snaps were on running plays), letting the offense key in on him.

I am not lamenting that we traded away Ivory, but when you see he still managed over 5.1 yards a carry even though his carry-to-snap ratio is a full 15% higher than Ingram (74 vs. 59), the "Ingram always faces 8 man fronts" argument becomes pretty much indefensible.

dueceloose 09-24-2013 05:08 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Any videos of Khiry running vs Cards

Jack Vegas 09-24-2013 05:15 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dueceloose (Post 531728)
Any videos of Khiry running vs Cards

Do you know how to do torrents?

Every week for the last 4-5 years I download games from tenyardtorrents.com to watch/study. They have some kinda tricky rules about how much you are supposed to upload vs. download but it's absolutely the best way to get game footage.

Tobias-Reiper 09-24-2013 05:22 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ikecomp (Post 531609)
While I agree it matters the situation he was in, I also believe if that had been ingram he wouldn't have done as well. So ultimately, the point remains that we think Krob is better. Only way to prove it is to give him some touches.

Who is saying anything about Ingram? Where did I mention Ingram?

Utah_Saint 09-24-2013 05:29 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dueceloose (Post 531728)
Any videos of Khiry running vs Cards

Here's a beauty.


Utah_Saint 09-24-2013 05:37 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boutte (Post 531697)
I just don't understand how anybody can have watched Ingram for two years and sees anything more than an average (at best) RB.

And the "every time he comes it's a run" arguement goes right out the window when look at what Ivory did when given a chance because it was the same situation for him.

And really, in the grand scheme of things, Pierre Thomas, Darren Sproles and Chris Ivory all had more yards per carry than Ingram.

Maybe we're not using Ingram right. Maybe he needs 20+ carries per game. Maybe he needs to get more involved in the passing game. Maybe he needs to run outside the tackles or sweeps more.

But in the end does it really matter what the cause is? Predictability, poor blocking, injury, strong headwinds, what ever the reason, the bottom line is, it's just not working.

Tobias-Reiper 09-24-2013 05:51 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas (Post 531616)
How so? I am simply showing you what Robinson does that is good; if a baseball player has a really good swing, then he can probably hit home runs off of good pitchers too, not just bad ones. Does Robinson have a good swing? Sure looks like it from what we've seen.

And that's great and all, but if you didn't notice, PT and Sproles did that as well and much more, and couldn't gain a yard the first half. Now going against a defeated, tired defense that's just going through the motions waiting for the game to end, yeah, anyone can look good.

Quote:

This analogy makes less than zero sense. I have re-read this sentence at least five times and I am still like "WTF is he talking about?" The two situations have absolutely nothing in common, except they are both things that take place on a football field.
Really? Both situations have nothing in common?
Both a 2 yard loss during a goal line stand and a kneel down count as a running play for a 2 yard loss. But the situations are rather different, right? During the goal line stand, especially when the game is tied or close, the defense is trying their hardest to stop the TD; during the victory formation, the defense stands up and touches the guys in front of them.

Do you see it now?

Just like you wouldn't give the same credit to a defense for stopping the run during a victory formation, I don't give credit to a RB who comes in after the fight, against a defense that's defeated, tired, and just wants to see the clock hit 00:00 so they can take a shower and go home.

Boutte 09-24-2013 10:43 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dueceloose (Post 531728)
Any videos of Khiry running vs Cards

http://boutte.smugmug.com/Other/My-S.../0/O/khiry.gif

dueceloose 09-24-2013 11:15 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Watches the gif over and over.

dueceloose 09-24-2013 11:16 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
He reminds me a lot of PT the way he puts his hand down and cuts.

Jack Vegas 09-25-2013 06:06 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 531749)

Just like you wouldn't give the same credit to a defense for stopping the run during a victory formation, I don't give credit to a RB who comes in after the fight, against a defense that's defeated, tired, and just wants to see the clock hit 00:00 so they can take a shower and go home.

And this is why I specifically pointed out carries 1 and 4 (Q4, 4:26 and Q4, 2:14).

These were both situations where the defense had all the gaps covered and the flow of the play was stopped, yet Robinson made something out of it anyway. Those plays had nothing to do with the defense being tired.

If Robinson had simply run through a couple of weak arm tackles, I might agree with you. But those plays were about his instincts and ability to find a hole that didn't exist relative to the original play call.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dueceloose (Post 531836)
He reminds me a lot of PT the way he puts his hand down and cuts.

He reminds me of both PT and Ivory in different ways. PT for the way he kind of shimmies his way around a tackle to get a couple of extra yards, same way Deuce used to do it too. And Ivory for the way he gets going so fast. Two steps and he's at full speed before he even hits the line.

I think the kid has the total package. The two big questions are, can he stay healthy, and can he block? Those are the two things that kept Ivory from becoming a much bigger part of the offense than he ended up being.

TheOak 09-25-2013 07:13 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Lets recap Khiry Robinsons tenure with the Saints according to a % of fans.

Preseason - "He was running against second string defenses."
Chiefs 12-52 4.3 AVE
Raiders 10-50 5.0 AVE
Texans 5-11 2.1 AVE
Dolphins 22-115 5.2 AVE

Regular Season - "The opponent gave up"
Cardinals 4-38 yards 9.5 AVE 21-Long

Now the rationalization that Khiry Robinson didn't get carries in weeks 1-2 and until the 4th Qtr because Sean Payton doesn't have faith in him.

1. Does anyone think Robinson would be on this team if Sean Payton didn't have any faith in him? Wouldn't it have been a whole lot easier to keep Cadet and give Robinson's roster spot to another position if Sean didnt think he could get it done?

2. I don't think Robinson or Cadet ran in weeks 1-2 because Sean was giving Ingram his chance to prove him self. That chance only goes so far when it hinders our running game.

Now lets look at that SECOND HALF (score S14-C7) and not the 4th Qtr., after 1/2 time adjustments against Arizona when they were "gassed and tired and defeated". I cant wait for these excuses..

Pierre Thomas - 8/33 4.1 AVE
Khiry Robinson - 4/38 9.5 AVE
Darren Sproles - 3/17 5.6 AVE

So the Cardinals gave up at the 1/2 only 1 TD behind and that's why we were able to run? Even if you cut Robins AVE in half he AVE 4.75 YPC.

Let it go... He ran just as well as PT and Sproles in the Second half even with his production cut in half. Khiry Robin is good and he can run, the only questions i have is can he stay healthy and can he keep the ball secure; so far he has not proven he cant do both... No less than any of our other RBs.

Utah_Saint 09-25-2013 07:50 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 531868)
the only questions i have is can he stay healthy and can he keep the ball secure; so far he has not proven he cant do both... No less than any of our other RBs.

He also needs to know his pass protections and blitz pick ups. I think that might be the biggest reason why he hasn't gotten into games yet. The offensive line is having enough trouble as it is.

Budsdrinker 09-25-2013 10:01 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas (Post 531722)
The thread I mentioned earlier: Saints use of Mark Ingram borders on criminal - Page 3 - The Shark Pool (NFL Talk) - Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Highlights:

Not a pretty picture... top 10 carries/snaps for RB with more than 18 snaps + Ingram @ 18
Snps Carries PCT YPC
mathews 20 13 0.650 2.5
cj2k 43 25 0.581 2.8
williams 31 17 0.548 5.1
f jax 26 13 0.500 5.2
ingram 18 9 0.500 1.2
mccoy 65 31 0.477 5.9
spiller 37 17 0.459 2.4
mendenhall 35 16 0.457 3.8
tate 20 9 0.450 6.1
charles 36 16 0.444 4.8


For his career, Ivory is averaging an astonishing 5.1 yards per carry (compared to the 3.9 of Ingram) despite the fact that when he's in the game it's a telltale sign the Saints are running (74.9 percent of his snaps were on running plays), letting the offense key in on him.

I am not lamenting that we traded away Ivory, but when you see he still managed over 5.1 yards a carry even though his carry-to-snap ratio is a full 15% higher than Ingram (74 vs. 59), the "Ingram always faces 8 man fronts" argument becomes pretty much indefensible.

Actually Ivory is down to 4.9 now since he is only averaging 2.8 this year and oh by the way out with a hamstring injury.

The Dude 09-25-2013 10:16 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Budsdrinker (Post 531909)
Actually Ivory is down to 4.9 now since he is only averaging 2.8 this year and oh by the way out with a hamstring injury.

And that imo is the main reason why we traded him. I had absolutely no problem at all with the trade. In fact just about every player we have parted ways with has had their production drop off our wound up injured. Looks like we know when to trade.

halloween 65 09-25-2013 12:08 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dude (Post 531914)
And that imo is the main reason why we traded him. I had absolutely no problem at all with the trade. In fact just about every player we have parted ways with has had their production drop off our wound up injured. Looks like we know when to trade.

Maybe, but Vilma, Smith, Ellis, and a few others that past their prime needed to go a lot sooner but someone in the Saints front office looked at them like they do an old worn out pair of shoes and kept them around for sentimental value. He!! Vilma and Smith made the team this year both should have been long gone 2 years ago. Not so sure we know when to trade or let go, the jury is still out for me on that issue!!

TheOak 09-25-2013 12:14 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
.......... sigh

SaintsBro 09-25-2013 02:00 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Why are people assuming the Cardinals defense was tired or gassed at the end? Up 'til then we had only one drive all day that was double-digit plays, everything else was actually pretty quick strikes or our famous three and outs.

TheOak 09-25-2013 02:04 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintsBro (Post 531995)
Why are people assuming the Cardinals defense was tired or gassed at the end? Up 'til then we had only one drive all day that was double-digit plays, everything else was actually pretty quick strikes or our famous three and outs.

Ive no clue... The assumption is that the 3rd ranked rushing defense got too tired to play and gave up.

Tobias-Reiper 09-25-2013 03:14 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintsBro (Post 531995)
Why are people assuming the Cardinals defense was tired or gassed at the end? Up 'til then we had only one drive all day that was double-digit plays, everything else was actually pretty quick strikes or our famous three and outs.

So can we assume Robinson is that much better a RB than both PT and Sproles and should be starting immediately?

Budsdrinker 09-25-2013 03:47 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintsBro (Post 531995)
Why are people assuming the Cardinals defense was tired or gassed at the end? Up 'til then we had only one drive all day that was double-digit plays, everything else was actually pretty quick strikes or our famous three and outs.

Time of possession was 35:31 for the Saints & 24:29 for Cards. KRob didn't enter the game until there was under 5 minutes left so that means their defense was already on the field more than 50% of the time and also it was 31-7. Maybe they gave up a little or wasn't playing as hard but clearly they were not the same looking defense the first 3 qtrs.

blackangold 09-25-2013 03:51 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 532009)
So can we assume Robinson is that much better a RB than both PT and Sproles and should be starting immediately?

Should we continue to assume that Mark Ingram is a better back than PT and Sproles and should continue to start when he is consistently out performed by EVERY running back on our roster?

blackangold 09-25-2013 03:52 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Budsdrinker (Post 532011)
Time of possession was 35:31 for the Saints & 24:29 for Cards. KRob didn't enter the game until there was under 5 minutes left so that means their defense was already on the field more than 50% of the time and also it was 31-7. Maybe they gave up a little or wasn't playing as hard but clearly they were not the same looking defense the first 3 qtrs.

One question:

Do you think Ingram would have had the same success with those same carries?

Budsdrinker 09-25-2013 03:59 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 532014)
One question:

Do you think Ingram would have had the same success with those same carries?

Hard to say, but in the first half no back had success but they did in the second half is all I'm saying. Granted KRob didn't have a shot in the first half.
My opinion is just not to get too excited about some good runs at the end of the game and declare KRob the starter when we don't know if he can handle all the responsibilities that comes with it. He is young and may not know all of the playbook with the way Brees calls audibles and changes protections. It's a big jump from West Texas A&M to NFL play calling.

Tobias-Reiper 09-25-2013 04:05 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackangold (Post 532013)
Should we continue to assume that Mark Ingram is a better back than PT and Sproles and should continue to start when he is consistently out performed by EVERY running back on our roster?

Who is talking about Ingram? Where did I mention Ingram in any of my posts? Why do people keep replying to me with anything to say about Ingram?

Jack Vegas 09-25-2013 04:14 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 532009)
So can we assume Robinson is that much better a RB than both PT and Sproles and should be starting immediately?

Don't think anybody is saying that. BUT, I have a very hard time believing Ingram would come up with those same kind of gains in that same situation.

That's not an Ingram bash, I'm only talking about him in terms of the depth chart. For that matter I am not as enamored with Sproles in terms of conventional running back carries, I don't think he's all that hot between the tackles.

Considering how bad our run game has been, I think it's reasonable to give the guy a shot.

Tobias-Reiper 09-25-2013 06:18 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas (Post 532018)
Don't think anybody is saying that. BUT, I have a very hard time believing Ingram...


... and again with Ingram. Why do people keep replying to me with any mention of Ingram, is a mystery to me.

Jack Vegas 09-25-2013 11:15 PM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 532065)
... and again with Ingram. Why do people keep replying to me with any mention of Ingram, is a mystery to me.

Because Ingram is the guy he is presumbly most in competition with for playing time as the between-the-tackles runner in this offense, of course. Because he is the guy who got in the game when Ingram was hurt. Because Ingram is averaging less than 2 yards per carry and it is reasonable that the coaches might just be looking elsewhere for someone to fill that role.

I would think the reasons would be fairly obvious at this point. Don't take it personal, it's just the reality of the situation.

Tobias-Reiper 09-26-2013 12:03 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas (Post 532129)
Because Ingram is the guy he is presumbly most in competition with for playing time as the between-the-tackles runner in this offense, of course. Because he is the guy who got in the game when Ingram was hurt. Because Ingram is averaging less than 2 yards per carry and it is reasonable that the coaches might just be looking elsewhere for someone to fill that role.

I would think the reasons would be fairly obvious at this point. Don't take it personal, it's just the reality of the situation.


What the heck are you talking about? Seriously... I am not taking anything personal... I posted about Robinson, and how I did not think what Robinson did was that impressive given the circumstances. Why do you insist on bringing up Ingram?

My guess is, in your mind, I am somehow putting Robinson down because I favor Ingram, and that is why I stated I wasn't impressed with what Robinson did? Is that it?

jnormand 09-26-2013 12:17 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Ok! Everybody just calm down!!! Stop yell-posting!!!

Jack Vegas 09-26-2013 01:20 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper (Post 532133)
My guess is, in your mind, I am somehow putting Robinson down because I favor Ingram, and that is why I stated I wasn't impressed with what Robinson did? Is that it?

Actually, no. I was just talking about the topic at hand.

Am I supposed to pay close attention to who I am responding to and take care not to mention certain players that may rub them the wrong way? Sorry, dude, but I have neither the time or inclination. I don't want to get pissy with you but that's just what it is.

To wit, it is practically impossible to talk about whether or not Khiry Robinson deserves playing time without also talking about his immediate competition on the depth chart. This is not a terribly difficult concept to grasp.

alleycat_126 09-26-2013 07:22 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ikecomp (Post 531192)
PS. Did anyone else notice how bad ben watson looked in pass protection?

Yes. Shawn Payton......

TheOak 09-26-2013 07:24 AM

Re: Khiry Robinson runs nasty
 
2 Attachment(s)
12 pages and 119 replies later and the Thread title still stands.


Khiry Robinson runs nasty.

FWIW, I did not see too many moments when he ran that he looked like he was checking anyone on our offensive lines prostate.

This is his 21 yard run, what I watched for was to see if the Cardinals defense looked gassed or gave up... E.G. Our offensive line reset the line of scrimmage within 2s of the snap (pushed it forward 2 yards). We didnt, the Cards defense is all over our backfield on this play, same as when everyone else runs. No more excuses about the line preforming better or the Cards giving up, their line beat us on this play and Khiry Robinson beat their defense. The line of scrimmage is the 45 and only DLP stood his man up, the rest of our offensive line was 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage as usual.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com