Remanding schedule

WHODATINCA · 10-04-2013, 06:35 AM

In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj.

Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point?

Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting.

Seer1 · 10-04-2013, 11:44 PM

Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat

Nope, Remanding.
Demanding / Remaining crossover.

Got it. Thought you were doing lawyer talk for a minute.

Seer1 · 10-04-2013, 11:47 PM

Originally Posted by WHODATINCA

In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj.

Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point?

Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting.

I agree about the running game, but wasn't the West Coast offense using the tiny pass as a running game thing? Or was it the Run and Gun or...?

ClintSaints · 10-05-2013, 12:33 AM

I believe that we will crush the 49ers and Cowboys. I view the Seahawks as the toughest challenge, due to both the environment and the possible weather problems. But we shall see.

WHODATINCA · 10-05-2013, 01:33 AM

Shaun O'Hara said it tonight on Playbook NFC. Darren Sproles and the screens and the check downs "on paper" replaces the running game in yards, but it doesn't replace the mentality of an offensive line that can be physical enough to get a yard or two when required.

I'd be happy if in the 1st - 3rd quarters, we could bang through some d-lines like K-Rob did in 4th qtr against Miami. Saying that our team isn't built for that is not good enough.

saintsfan1976 · 10-05-2013, 07:21 AM

Originally Posted by WHODATINCA

In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj.

Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point?

Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting.

Welcome aboard WHODATINCA.

Yes, the O line has been raked over the coals all season. We've done our fare share here of beating that dead horse as well.

Look, the O line hasn't played up to what we're used to seeing. Have the string of replacements finally caught up with us? Who knows. But to bring in another lineman now probably won't happen.

I'll be these guys get it together soon. At least allowing less pressure on Brees. The zone blocking thing I'm not as optimistic about, at least not this season.

Euphoria · 10-05-2013, 07:35 AM

The problem with the predictions is that you're setting up this expectation.

How about enjoy the games and how it plays out it plays out. I can never get into this prediction thing.

10-04-2013, 06:35 AM	#11
WHODATINCA Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: South Bay Posts: 3,784	Re: Remanding schedule In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj. Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point? Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting. saintsfan1976 likes this.

10-04-2013, 11:44 PM	#12
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Remanding schedule Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat Nope, Remanding. Demanding / Remaining crossover. Got it. Thought you were doing lawyer talk for a minute.

10-04-2013, 11:47 PM	#13
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Remanding schedule Originally Posted by WHODATINCA In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj. Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point? Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting. I agree about the running game, but wasn't the West Coast offense using the tiny pass as a running game thing? Or was it the Run and Gun or...?

10-05-2013, 12:33 AM	#14
ClintSaints 500th Post Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Glendale, CA Posts: 603	Re: Remanding schedule I believe that we will crush the 49ers and Cowboys. I view the Seahawks as the toughest challenge, due to both the environment and the possible weather problems. But we shall see.

10-05-2013, 01:33 AM	#15
WHODATINCA Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: South Bay Posts: 3,784	Re: Remanding schedule Shaun O'Hara said it tonight on Playbook NFC. Darren Sproles and the screens and the check downs "on paper" replaces the running game in yards, but it doesn't replace the mentality of an offensive line that can be physical enough to get a yard or two when required. I'd be happy if in the 1st - 3rd quarters, we could bang through some d-lines like K-Rob did in 4th qtr against Miami. Saying that our team isn't built for that is not good enough.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-05-2013, 07:21 AM	#16
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,846 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Remanding schedule Originally Posted by WHODATINCA In other threads, you guys seem to actually want to discuss both the merits AND weaknesses of the team. What happened here? Attack of the homer-zombies? The only one who came to play is amusingly enough Homerj. Personally, I think we need a run game to make it to the playoffs ( and, further ). So, I agree with Homer, about the O-line and I am surprised with the new CFL acquisition rather than money for the O-line. But, maybe it's too late to add to the O-line at this point? Also, if we make it past both the Bears and Pats, IMO sky's the limit ( exception: Seattle at home ). So, maybe, 15-1, or realistically, 13-3 again, again, again. You know the drill. If we are really serious, I say we take every game except maybe Seattle and drop one other game just because winning can be exhausting. Welcome aboard WHODATINCA. Yes, the O line has been raked over the coals all season. We've done our fare share here of beating that dead horse as well. Look, the O line hasn't played up to what we're used to seeing. Have the string of replacements finally caught up with us? Who knows. But to bring in another lineman now probably won't happen. I'll be these guys get it together soon. At least allowing less pressure on Brees. The zone blocking thing I'm not as optimistic about, at least not this season. WHODATINCA likes this.

10-05-2013, 07:35 AM	#17
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Remanding schedule The problem with the predictions is that you're setting up this expectation. How about enjoy the games and how it plays out it plays out. I can never get into this prediction thing.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/60882-remanding-schedule.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Remanding schedule	This thread	Refback	10-03-2013 01:34 PM	19
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-03-2013 01:13 PM	3