|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; So what you are saying is, you would rather see Pierre score by making five smaller grinding 5 yard runs, then on a single 25 yard screen pass. OK....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: No Running Game
So what you are saying is, you would rather see Pierre score by making five smaller grinding 5 yard runs, then on a single 25 yard screen pass. OK.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
100th Post
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London, England
Posts: 272
|
Re: No Running Game
Originally Posted by SaintsBro
Yes, that's exactly what I was saying. You did well to read between the lines there ... ummmm ... no. I wasn't questioning Pierre Thomas, which I had hoped was indicated by the rest of the context around it. I was saying that based on the logic we have crucified Mark Ingram on, we should also hold up Pierre Thomas. And because I don't think Pierre is to blame, I was using that to demonstrate the real problem definitely lies with the O-line. Having said that, the stats do not lie, on the ground we are very poor indeed.![]()
Look at those down-and-1 conversions. They were worrying. You should be able to plough through them and carry on but we were at 4th down far too many times. We are definitely managing the clock very well but let's understand why we are doing that. That's largely because we are getting the opposition offence off the field so damn quickly. That is our defence doing that great work. And yes Brees throwing the ball about with so much accuracy obviously helps a great deal but I would rather see a balanced game and an improved running game. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 957
|
Re: No Running Game
PT may have struggled but he does more than Ingram.. So why don't we steal a ol from someones PS or something Lol. 5-0 super bowl bound
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston
Posts: 2,089
|
![]()
Originally Posted by thebdj
Cant we argue about this when it causes us to lose a game. This is a waste of keystrokes. For this version of the Saints at the skill positions the threat is so much more important than the run itself. An effective run opens up the play action..... And the play action today was there.... Robert Meacham was robbed?![]()
This game was about as balanced as the Saints have been... And to the actual running games credit as long as Briggs didn't shoot the gap we were getting 5-6 yards per instead of the Mark Ingrams 1-2 yrds per... and we actually made the a few of the 4-1s' we took vs getting stopped on 4-1 because there was no second effort.... |
You shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house, and if have a glass jaw you should watch your mouth..... cause I'll break your face!!! -50 cent
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Bay
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: No Running Game
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/60963-no-running-game.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest Mark Ingram News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 10-06-2013 08:45 PM | 2 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 10-06-2013 05:12 PM | 3 |
No Running Game | This thread | Refback | 10-06-2013 05:10 PM | 27 |