Re: Question for the Forum
 

Ingram didn't lose the game for us today and having Ivory would not have won it for us either.

Transparent scapegoating.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

Agreed. Team loss. Unless Ingram plays DT.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

He's not a bruiser. Again, he even said this when he was drafted. He's no Deuce. Never going to be that and I knew it when we drafted him. I did however think he would be more involved in the passing game and he is not. I honestly don't understand it. He made some great catches in PS...

Re: Question for the Forum
 

Is this the falcons board? What the hell is happening on here?

Re: Question for the Forum
 

I know he's not a bruiser, and I was one of those who criticized drafting him from the start, so this isn't just a knee jerk reaction. But they have advertized him as a bruiser and tried to make him the short yardage grinder, with zero success. And yeah, they also said he'd be great for play action, yet he might have 10 catches for his career.

I'm not sure what the actual number is, but I know he's been a non factor in the passing game as you said.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

Ok... I see that there was a comparison made between the two guys, but I don't think it was about who would have won the game.

Ivory was always a better player. But I don't miss him that much, considering Khiry Robinson seems like a very similar player and perhaps more explosive. The coaches just don't seem willing to trust him for whatever reason.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

I dont really care. Its 6 one way half a dozen the other. Both situations are less than ideal. I just want a line that several different backs can gain yards behind.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

I hear ya 403, and I'm not getting in on any of this. I'm just reading and scratching my head.

Re: Question for the Forum
 

Why not play Cadet and Khiry??? We got talent at RB.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Re: Question for the Forum
 

It ain't the RB. It's the o-line.