NEW Mark Ingram thread (post Dallas)

[Euphoria]

Don't call it Ingram haters... his performance warranted it.

One game against a D like Dallas doesn't make him a pro-bowler just yet unless we get to play Dallas every week.

But I do home that this game helped him with his vision and got him to see and understand what he has to do for us.

Also keep in mind Dallas had no LB's.

[Danno]

Originally Posted by Euphoria

Don't call it Ingram haters... his performance warranted it.

One game against a D like Dallas doesn't make him a pro-bowler just yet unless we get to play Dallas every week.

But I do home that this game helped him with his vision and got him to see and understand what he has to do for us.

Also keep in mind Dallas had no LB's.

No, its haters. I know what haters look like, and he had numerous haters.

No one is calling him a pro-bowler.

His vision wasn't as much of the problem as being surrounded by 3 defenders 1 micro-second after getting the hand-off was.

The O-line was opening holes, and he did what he was supposed to do.

[TheOak]

Originally Posted by Danno

No, its haters. I know what haters look like, and he had numerous haters.

No one is calling him a pro-bowler.

His vision wasn't as much of the problem as being surrounded by 3 defenders 1 micro-second after getting the hand-off was.

The O-line was opening holes, and he did what he was supposed to do.

Correct me if I am wrong, isn't the test of even a good back the ability to run where there isn't much of a hole?

Its quite logical that with a good hole, any back could run.

[Danno]

Originally Posted by TheOak

Correct me if I am wrong, isn't the test of even a good back the ability to run where there isn't much of a hole?

Its quite logical that with a good hole, any back could run.

That wasn't my point.

Its logical that even good backs will be tackled for a loss when surrounded by defenders immediately after the hand-off.