|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'll do the o-line tomorrow... Quite a few interesting items at first glance....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,055
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
I'll do the o-line tomorrow...
Quite a few interesting items at first glance. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
Grades? anyone remember their college GPA?
I stll say that scoring defense is the only number that matters-- 18.1 points per game allowed, 4th in the league |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
Originally Posted by ScottF
Hard to argue with that one. Especially since scoring defense also includes pick-sixes, fumble returns for TD and special teams TD's.![]()
Fourth in the league is simply a very very good number. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,055
|
Surprising Grades on Defense
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,482
|
Surprising Grades on Defense
Not surprised... Lofton is doing what he can but he was never a great MLB in a 4-3 defense so his new role in this defense would obviously take some getting used to. I'm really curious about C.J. Mosley/Kyle Van Noy in the draft next year even if we have to trade up to get them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 8,120
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
Originally Posted by ChrisXVI
He was superb in Atlanta. Thing with Lofton, he's not good in pass coverage. Hes also not very fast. I'm interested in getting faster at the position.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,482
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
He wasn't superb in Atlanta... They let him go because he wasn't a 3 down player. We were suckered in to signing him and now he's not quite fitting in because of the exact same reason the Falcons let him walk. He's an ok player but the Falcons were unfortunately right... He's not that good in coverage and he's not a good tackler.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Cake or Death?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,608
|
Surprising Grades on Defense
Originally Posted by ChrisXVI
I must be watching a different team. The Saints are the ones wearing black and gold correct? J/k Chris. But I can't agree with you on Lofton.
![]()
|
Last edited by exile; 11-15-2013 at 08:24 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
Originally Posted by TheOak
missed tackles - their definition of miss tackles? ![]()
Lofton is a 43 guy thats why we brought him here. in a 34 he is a 2 down LB that is a bit out of place. besides no one ever concidered him a cover LB. in fact that is why the falclowns let him go. but he seems to be working on it that or he is stumbling into the right passing lanes a bit more this year. But he is getting better ![]() Pass rush takes time. he is a small school kid that i am willing to give 2 more years to develop, way ahead of the curve in my book of course he gets picked on. never put up great INT numbers so he is a solid risk to attack some one has to wear the crown |
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
Last edited by hagan714; 11-16-2013 at 04:49 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Site Donor 2019
|
Re: Surprising Grades on Defense
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61926-surprising-grades-defense.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-15-2013 10:14 AM | 3 |
Surprising Grades on Defense | This thread | Refback | 11-15-2013 10:06 AM | 33 |