... Michael Strahan, Shannon Sharpe, Deon Sanders, Michael Irvin, Charles Barkley and Shaq have jobs. They are not just there to inform you but inform you and entertain you. So in that regard, they are part of the news.

That would be nice, except that Im not entertained by these guys. #1, they're a few points below my reading level. #2, they're obnoxious.

You know, we used to just one or two guys doing analysis.... Maybe Phyllis George in for aethetics. All we really needed was Bryant Gumbel, and he didnt have to say dicktastic stuff to get attention for himself. He just described the game.

Now, despite all the goofiness, Chris Berman is the BEST alive now.
He tells the story of the game, and throws in some facts you didnt know. Plus he has a deep respect for history. If you throw aside all the goof stuff, he does one thing better than anyone else. HE TELLS THE STORY OF THE GAME.

All the Rich Eisens can go put their head in a garbage compacter.
Does anyone else try to watch those "top 10" shows on NFL Network?
If they would just tell the story, it would be so good. Instead, they insist
on all those short-attention-span idiots trying to be funny. Like that guy who looks like Mick Jaggers gayer little brother. I wish he would just go
thru one day of full contact practice, along with those little Jewish homo
twins.... I am so interested in the show, but I cant stand the talking idiots,
and also, everything is presented in short-attention span formatics.... all that
swishing... all those effects... Im dying of graphics. no wonder kids now are so stupid.

Same goes for the Highlights on NFLN... It sounds like the guys are narrating an episode of Jackass, not a beautiful game played by world class athletes.
Slow down... put on some Mozart.... STFU & Let John Facenda talk.

Football sells itself. If you would just show it. I dont
need 7 idiots talking smack. Just show highlights. Just ... show.... football.
And tell me the story of the game. I can get my jokes from somewhere else.