New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Brooks fined (https://blackandgold.com/saints/62122-brooks-fined.html)

ScottF 11-21-2013 08:03 AM
Re: Brooks fined
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euphoria (Post 550747)
I am all for the penalty on the play... but a fine, that is just ridiculous.

It had no malicious intent. If he did then the other hand wouldn't have came around to protect Brees some from being slammed to the ground. It was a move to tackle that was just a little high otherwise it would have been fair play.

Fines are getting ridiculous. Penalty was enough in this case.
how is it not malicious? He swung his arm at Brees' neck/head. A good football play would've been to lower the shoulder and drive it into the QB's back, but he chose to go high instead. And it cost him.

Euphoria 11-21-2013 08:13 AM
Re: Brooks fined
 
kicking someone in the balls sure fine but playing football and making an innocent mistake is something other. Where are the fines for holding?

Euphoria 11-21-2013 08:21 AM
Re: Brooks fined
 
how is it not malicious? He swung his arm at Brees' neck/head. A good football play would've been to lower the shoulder and drive it into the QB's back, but he chose to go high instead. And it cost him.

You need to look at the clip. His arm didn't swing, he purposely put it out and grabbed Bree's. He also used his other arm as he came around to brace and protect brees so Bree WASN't Slammed down to the ground. That to me would have be malicious intent. Punching Brees in the balls that is malicious intent... not making a football play that went wrong.

SaintsBro 11-21-2013 11:53 AM
Re: Brooks fined
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euphoria (Post 550747)
I am all for the penalty on the play... but a fine, that is just ridiculous.

It had no malicious intent. If he did then the other hand wouldn't have came around to protect Brees some from being slammed to the ground. It was a move to tackle that was just a little high otherwise it would have been fair play.

Fines are getting ridiculous. Penalty was enough in this case.
His other hand came around to "protect" Brees? LOL. I'm sorry, but that's just crazy talk. Your explanation is so convoluted, it's not even making any sense.

SloMotion 11-21-2013 01:04 PM
Re: Brooks fined
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOak (Post 550915)
Au contraire mon frere

I was traumatized.... emotionally scarred brother. I have had to completely rethink my personality as the soft kitten like Oak was just to vulnerable. Way too much Mr. nice guy ... huge boobed women brought me 100% agreement ...
Well, if it's any consolation, I've always thought of you as kind of a "Cat Vader" ... and darn it! I musta' missed the large-chested-woman one ... probably too busy agreeing with you, :lol:.

http://www.funnycutestuff.com/wp-con...-vader-cat.jpg


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com