Question for the Forum

Danno · 01-02-2014, 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game?

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have.

I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

|Mitch| · 01-02-2014, 06:21 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours.

Kind of like that Graham incomplete pass that Sean threw the red flag on... I've watched the game 3-4 times and that was absolutely a catch, even Billick was saying it was a catch. Didn't matter, it stood as called

WhoDat!656 · 01-02-2014, 06:25 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have.

I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

How would games last 4 hours?

I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply.

Danno · 01-02-2014, 07:13 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

How would games last 4 hours?

I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply.

I just wanted a soapbox. Carry on.

01-02-2014, 06:08 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,748	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game? No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have. I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

01-02-2014, 06:21 PM	#2
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Danno No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. Kind of like that Graham incomplete pass that Sean threw the red flag on... I've watched the game 3-4 times and that was absolutely a catch, even Billick was saying it was a catch. Didn't matter, it stood as called

01-02-2014, 06:25 PM	#3
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,085	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Danno No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have. I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether. How would games last 4 hours? I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply. Danno likes this.

01-02-2014, 07:13 PM	#4
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,748	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 How would games last 4 hours? I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply. I just wanted a soapbox. Carry on. WhoDat!656 likes this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/63380-question-forum.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Question for the Forum	This thread	Refback	01-02-2014 06:40 PM	3