Question for the Forum

WhoDat!656 · 01-02-2014, 06:48 PM

Should penalties be included in challenges?

Danno · 01-02-2014, 06:54 PM

No, in fact no plays shouldn't be included in challenges.

|Mitch| · 01-02-2014, 06:59 PM

I don't like the idea of challenging penalties, but I do think the refs should be trained to be more consistent with the calls...

WhoDat!656 · 01-02-2014, 07:06 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, in fact no plays shouldn't be included in challenges.

You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game?

Danno · 01-02-2014, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game?

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have.

I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

|Mitch| · 01-02-2014, 07:21 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours.

Kind of like that Graham incomplete pass that Sean threw the red flag on... I've watched the game 3-4 times and that was absolutely a catch, even Billick was saying it was a catch. Didn't matter, it stood as called

WhoDat!656 · 01-02-2014, 07:25 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have.

I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

How would games last 4 hours?

I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply.

Schmohams · 01-02-2014, 07:32 PM

Officiating needs to be done by a group of people looking at screens of clips recorded by camera, I do believe penalties should be open for challenge.

saintsfan1976 · 01-02-2014, 07:41 PM

Originally Posted by Schmohams

Officiating needs to be done by a group of people looking at screens of clips recorded by camera, I do believe penalties should be open for challenge.

I can kind of agree with this. If the NFL didn't have to make such a dramatic display of challenges - refs running to view under the booth(silly).

Danno · 01-02-2014, 08:13 PM

Originally Posted by WhoDat!656

How would games last 4 hours?

I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply.

I just wanted a soapbox. Carry on.

01-02-2014, 06:48 PM	#1
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Question for the Forum Should penalties be included in challenges?

01-02-2014, 06:54 PM	#2
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Re: Question for the Forum No, in fact no plays shouldn't be included in challenges.

01-02-2014, 06:59 PM	#3
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Question for the Forum I don't like the idea of challenging penalties, but I do think the refs should be trained to be more consistent with the calls...

01-02-2014, 07:06 PM	#4
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Danno No, in fact no plays shouldn't be included in challenges. You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game?

01-02-2014, 07:08 PM	#5
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 You wouldn't, for example, challenge the personal foul penalty that was called on Strief in the kittens game? No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have. I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-02-2014, 07:21 PM	#6
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Danno No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. Kind of like that Graham incomplete pass that Sean threw the red flag on... I've watched the game 3-4 times and that was absolutely a catch, even Billick was saying it was a catch. Didn't matter, it stood as called

01-02-2014, 07:25 PM	#7
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Danno No, we'd still get screwed and games would last 4 hours. I don't wanna give the refs any more power to decide a game than they already have. I'd prefer to abolish instant replay altogether. How would games last 4 hours? I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply. Danno likes this.

01-02-2014, 07:32 PM	#8
Schmohams 500th Post Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Texas Posts: 551	Re: Question for the Forum Officiating needs to be done by a group of people looking at screens of clips recorded by camera, I do believe penalties should be open for challenge. ScottF and saintsfan1976 like this.

01-02-2014, 07:41 PM	#9
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,846 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by Schmohams Officiating needs to be done by a group of people looking at screens of clips recorded by camera, I do believe penalties should be open for challenge. I can kind of agree with this. If the NFL didn't have to make such a dramatic display of challenges - refs running to view under the booth(silly). ScottF likes this.

01-02-2014, 08:13 PM	#10
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Re: Question for the Forum Originally Posted by WhoDat!656 How would games last 4 hours? I'm not saying give teams MORE challenges. A coach would still have to decide if it is worth challenging or not; the same rules would still apply. I just wanted a soapbox. Carry on. WhoDat!656 likes this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/63380-question-forum.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Question for the Forum	This thread	Refback	01-02-2014 07:40 PM	3