New Orleans Saints' rushing attack has Seattle Seahawks' attention

pherein · 01-08-2014, 09:09 PM

Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so..

We ran at will against Philly, they are #14

We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible.
#2 CAR probably wont work.
#4 SF might not work.

BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run.

NonieT · 01-08-2014, 09:41 PM

Originally Posted by pherein

Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so..

We ran at will against Philly, they are #14

We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible.
#2 CAR probably wont work.
#4 SF might not work.

BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run.

They ran fine against Carolina in Wk16. For some unfathomable reason they stopped. They also ran fine the first time they played San Francisco.

Kryptonite · 01-09-2014, 05:41 AM

Originally Posted by pherein

Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so..

We ran at will against Philly, they are #14

We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible.
#2 CAR probably wont work.
#4 SF might not work.

BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run.

According to NFL.com, Seattle ranked 7th (correct) allowing 1626 rushing yds, while Philly ranked 10th allowing 1668 yds. That's a 42yd difference spread out over 16 games. You can make numbers say anything.

As long as we focus on the run, they (hawks) don't phase me a bit.

01-08-2014, 09:41 PM	#2
NonieT 500th Post Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 921	Re: New Orleans Saints' rushing attack has Seattle Seahawks' attention Originally Posted by pherein Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so.. We ran at will against Philly, they are #14 We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible. #2 CAR probably wont work. #4 SF might not work. BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run. They ran fine against Carolina in Wk16. For some unfathomable reason they stopped. They also ran fine the first time they played San Francisco. blackangold likes this.
NonieT 500th Post Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 921

01-09-2014, 05:41 AM	#3
Kryptonite DAMMIT BOY! Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Crestview, FL via S'port LA Posts: 197	Re: New Orleans Saints' rushing attack has Seattle Seahawks' attention Originally Posted by pherein Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so.. We ran at will against Philly, they are #14 We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible. #2 CAR probably wont work. #4 SF might not work. BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run. According to NFL.com, Seattle ranked 7th (correct) allowing 1626 rushing yds, while Philly ranked 10th allowing 1668 yds. That's a 42yd difference spread out over 16 games. You can make numbers say anything. As long as we focus on the run, they (hawks) don't phase me a bit.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/63628-new-orleans-saints-rushing-attack-has-seattle-seahawks-attention.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
New Orleans Saints' rushing attack has Seattle Seahawks' attention	This thread	Refback	01-08-2014 09:29 PM	21
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-08-2014 09:08 PM	2

01-08-2014, 09:09 PM	#1
pherein failclownHunter Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: N.O. and V.A. Posts: 2,260 Blog Entries: 3	Re: New Orleans Saints' rushing attack has Seattle Seahawks' attention Run defense is going to be important in this and the next game so.. We ran at will against Philly, they are #14 We will have to run the same against SEA #7, which is possible. #2 CAR probably wont work. #4 SF might not work. BTW NO has the #15 by yards allowed, which is not bad considering they usually dont concentrate on the run.