|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by ScottF Exactly my thought. What do we OWE Jimmy Graham? Yes, HE signed his rookie contract, and who would know how unbelievably great he would turn out? Well, maybe Loomis, who 'gambled' on a 3rd round pick ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by ScottF
Doesn't work that way, unless all the busts are also forced to give the owner back all the money they didn't earn.![]()
Rookie contracts are for earning what the owner/GM think you'll be worth. You 2nd/3rd/4th contract is based on what the owner/GM think you'll be worth. The only way to make that a bit more fair is to go to one year contracts for everyone, or base each players pay on what they did the previous season. Play 1st, then get paid for how well you did. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by Danno
Yeah, I know it doesn't... just wanted to give some perspective with all the Graham indignation going on.![]()
I like your line of thinking...Can we get Jimmy a signing bonus check with the names Sullivan, Smith or Ellis on the signature line? |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/64578-saints-could-lose-jimmy-graham-non-exclusive-tag.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 03-01-2014 07:11 PM | 10 |
Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag | This thread | Refback | 03-01-2014 06:38 PM | 129 |