![]() |
NFL Designates Graham... TE
Saints' Jimmy Graham designated as tight end, not wide receiver, for franchise tag purposes | gulflive.com
Saints' Jimmy Graham designated as tight end, not wide receiver, for franchise tag purposes The Associated Press By The Associated Press on March 03, 2014 at 6:17 PM, updated March 03, 2014 at 6:25 PM NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana -- The NFL has formally designated New Orleans' Jimmy Graham as a tight end for the purposes of his franchise tag value, which is now set at $7.05 million next season unless Graham and the Saints subsequently agree on a long-term deal. The designation was released Monday after the deadline passed for NFL teams to use franchise or transition tags on players becoming free agents. Because Graham often split out from the offensive line as a receiver would, there have been questions concerning whether the NFL's collective bargaining agreement calls for Graham to have a receiver's tag, worth $12.1 million. Graham still could file a grievance, leaving an arbitrator to decide which tag is appropriate. As a non-exclusive franchise player, Graham is free to negotiate an offer sheet with another NFL team. The Saints could either match that deal or accept two first-round draft picks as compensation. Similarly, the Saints used their franchise tag on quarterback Drew Brees in March 2012, then needed a little more than four months to work out the five-year, $100 million deal Brees signed shortly before training camp. Like Brees, Graham is represented by Creative Artists Agency. They do not have the same agent. Graham is represented by Jimmy Sexton and Brees by Tom Condon. Graham has said publicly during the Pro Bowl in February that it would be "unfortunate," if the team used the franchise tag on him, but on Friday he reacted to the move with subtle humor. Afterward, Graham wrote on his Twitter account, "Confirming it's officially Franchisefriday... TAG ... I guess I'm it." Graham, a former college basketball who played one year of football at Miami, was drafted by the Saints in 2010. Last season, he led the Saints in catches with 86, yards with 1,215 and touchdowns with 16. He has led the Saints in catches in each of the past three seasons, while leading the club in yards receiving and touchdowns in two of the last three seasons. During the past three regular seasons combined, he has 270 catches for 3,507 yards and 36 touchdowns. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
We owe 7. He wants 12. Give him 9 point whatever makes him make just a little more than Gronk, because he's earned it.
Not a dollar more. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I say stick with 7, so we can sign more key players
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Trade for four number ones ...
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
That might really change the game ... A team can offer him 10 , and we'd get our 1sts
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I don't know if anyone is dumb enough to give up two 1sts for a TE, just to turn around and give him $12 million a year. We'll likely get stuck with this bad contract thats coming. So we make the playoffs, no Super Bowl though
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Extra picks are extra picks ...especially with this being a deep draft. ... we won tge Super Bowl without Graham. ..we'll be fine
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
We new this, he's a tight end.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Not upset by this. IMO he is a TE. A very gifted one, but a TE no less. I know Jimmy will sign with us. But if he chooses to go elsewhere then we get we picks. I see a very long hold out here. Probably until July or August. If I'm wrong great.
Let's get real tho. Jimmy is a big part of the offense. Do we NEED him? No. Do we WANT him? Yes. Does he make us better? Yes. Does Drew make him better? Absolutely. They will work out a deal and Jimmy will get signed for the next 5 years. It'll just take most of the off season to do. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Things might be looking up!! Some team might offer 7.5 and 2 picks. I could go with a player from another team and 1 first rd. pick.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Send him to Buffalo for Jarius Byrd and a 1st round pick this year.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Seen as his tag is 7M, I could honestly see a team coming in and offering him 9-10 mil, if they were willing to give up two firsts
Come on Oakland, make the call! |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Teams are very apprehensive to trade for Franchise Tagged players, at the minimum they know that they are trading for a player that was tagged because he refused to meet his team in the middle somewhere and had to be tagged to keep him. Its a huge yellow/gray area.
As a GM you would be the laughing stock of the NFL and probably fired if you traded to get Graham and then once he showed up you couldn't get a deal done because he decided he wants 60m for 5 years and 34m of it has to be upfront to prevent you from back loaded it so he only gets 10m before you are showing him the door. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I thought of the connection w Doug Marrone and him needing a go to for his young QB. I wouldn't consider it any more risky than drafting a TE in round 1 which is essentially what they're getting with Graham
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
a first right of refusal (not a right of first refusal, as some of you may mistakenly call it) pretty much ends discussion by another team. If you know your bid will be second best, there is nothing to be gained unless your a division opponent to making a bid. Given that our division is kinda playing on the edge with cap, I seriously doubt that they would risk devastating their franchise by playing chicken with the Saints. Even then, the FROR would keep them blocked, then signal to the rest of the team that the franchise can be blackmailed.
Jimmy gots ta negotiate reality, not fantasy. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
now two 1s for jimmy might be had but two #1 are cap friendly it will be interesting to see what happens but i think he is a tagged saint for 2014.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I would rather keep Jimmy at 7m that roll the dice on a 1st round pick this year and a first round pick next year.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Is go 9 for a miss match in 13 games like he is. A miss match of his caliber in this league is very hard to find. How many receiving miss matches of his caliber are there? 3 maybe 4 in a good day. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I have no doubt whatsoever Graham (Sexton) and Loomis get a deal put together, probably around the $9.25 million range. That is very workable given the escalating cap.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
I don't think its to far fetch that a team that is in position to win and win now makes a run at him. 4-5 teams perhaps.
The only flaw is that those teams aren't typically the type that trades for a vet with a high price on there heads they tend to let them go and draft well. I like what Jimmy is doing though he deserves the money. I like what the Saints are doing... 'hey here he is who has the balls to pull the trigger'. It would make an exciting off season if someone did. But it would be a later round draft pick is the problem. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Don't forget, the projected cap for 2014 was only about $125M. The actual 2014 cap is around $133M, going up to $140 in 2015 and $150 or more in 2016. That leaves a great deal of room for Loomis to have at it. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Quote:
Say JG gets an $18 million signing bonus on a $60 million contract over 6 years. The cap hit of the signing bonus is only $3 million a year. But JG gets his $18 million on signing day. Salary in years one, two, and three may be $2, $2, $2 million for example. So the cap hit is $5 million per year for the first three years. Then it escalates so that the salary the last year is $15 million. But guess what? It's only a 3 year contract. After three years (or four) the team can either work with JG to restructure, or cut him and take the hit on the rest of the signing bonus (which is $9 or $6 million at that point). Depending on the release date, it could be spread over two years of dead money. So everyone wins. It's the "richest" TE contract in history. It "averages" $10 million a year. It's actually a 3 year $24 million contract, with $20 million guaranteed. And the cap hit over the first three years is $5 million instead of $7 million, $8.4 million, and then the crazy QB number if the tag were to go into the third year ($17 million or something like that). But no one is going to bother to blink this early in the process. The Saints have the leverage of round one (the tag) and round two (tagged as a TE). Round three is the arbitration on the grievance that should be filed by this time tomorrow. And then the waiting game until sometime in July. And BTW any team in the NFL that's truly willing to give up two FRDP and a huge contract for a TE is foolish. Franchise players get tagged every year. How many of them actually get signed away? There's a reason for that. All the tag does is keep both sides in the ring for another 4 months trying to work out a contract. Everyone has their job to do. The Saints need to get the best value out of the situation. JG's agent's job is to extract the most money for his client. But just like Brees a couple of years ago, the Saints want the player and the player wants to play for the Saints. So in the end, they will work it out. I honestly think that the fantasy football here is that some team is going to be stupid or desperate enough to pull the trigger on JG under these conditions. It's going to be a long offseason. So may as well hunker down. SFIAH |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Very aware of all of that. 60m/5 years (20m signing bonus) Yearly distribution of Bonus towards cap: 1. 4m 2. 4m 3. 4m 4. 4m 5. 4m Now you have 40m to distribute over 5 years *in a way he will agree* Ave 8m/year in salary 1. 4m + 6m 2. 4m + 6m 3. 4m + 6m 4. 4m + 9m 5. 4m + 13m That is still a 10m in cap hit this year, 2 more than we have right now with out draft picks, resign free agents, practice squad, and 2m to start the season. There has to be a 2m cushion to start, we have been proven to lose at least 1 starter per season before opening week. 2013 we lost at least 3.... Just draft picks alone is 3m ish Practice squad 400k Start cushion 3m Total delta after Graham's contract = 10m Now what free agents are you resigning? I didn't say impossible, I said not as easy as it looks. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Jimmy won't sign a 2,2,2 and I wouldn't either. Your essentially telling him he can kiss 30m good bye and he knows that. His agent won't let that happen, Drew's didn't either. You have to be more subtle than that. Jimmy doesn't have to sign what you put in front of him. Regardless, he consumed ALL cap space and we are 8-10m in the hole when he inks. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Why not just give him 10m bonus and balloon the end? 3m cap hit....
2m +1m 2m +1m 2m +1m 2m +1m 2m + 46m Because he won't sign that cr4p. He wants to be PAID not TOLD. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
BTW, he was tagged for a reason remember? If it was easy as some people think, he would have been signed.
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
Who is rushing? Again, all I said was that it is not as easy a task as some believe. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
That said, may not want Jimmy out there getting offers for too long.
Jerry just restructured Romo and he is the special type of person that would give the house for Graham. |
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
Quote:
|
Re: NFL Designates Graham... TE
We all knew he was going to get the TE tag..........now we wait and see.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com