![]() |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Preston Parker outplayed everyone in preseason, at wide receiver and kick returner and still got cut
I wish we had kept him around and used him on returns instead of sproles |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Rice can't stay healthy, move on
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
If he could stay healthy he'd cost 3 times as much. Its the kind of player you keep on the phone squad in case you need a guy for 3 or 4 weeks, or to hold the fort until some rookie develops. We aren't looking at him for anything other than a cheap but talented stop gap vet with some major upside if he can stay healthy. |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
IMO he would be a nice luxury if we had the money, but he is way too injury prone to bring in just as a luxury.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
even at league min i have to say pass. how many games can you get out him before he goes back in the tub
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Pass he had one good year with Brett with Vikings
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
I'm glad our fans aren't GM's. Colston and Lance Moore would be here until they're 40. Andy Tanner would be a starter. Jimmy Graham would be getting $17 million a year. The ship would sink so fast. Lol.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Rice played a full season in 2012. Did not put up the numbers he did in 09. But if he stays healthy in this offense 70-80 catches with a possible 1000 yard season is not out of the question.
I like the idea of buying low on Rice, and drafting a receiver in round one. |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
Pick practice. |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Why sign Rice when we just released Moore?!?
Stills is an ascending player and you have a player in Toon or a probable draft pick who will need those invaluable reps to develop... We could have signed a better, inexpensive option in Hakeem Nicks to a one year prove it option... But I geaux back to too many receivers inhibit development by limiting reps... Believe one of the biggest reasons Colston did so well because he got the reps to develop... |
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Saints considering Rice means Saints don't have a lot of money left to spend.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
I like Rice and all but with his injury history I just don't know if he is worth the risk.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Bears are expected to release Earl Bennett. (cap casualty) If the price is right...
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Not keen on Bennett at all,if you want to kick the tires on a a vet receiver might as well call Brandon Lloyd.He will be desperate as he never played last year
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Lloyd is 32 and he is done. Bennett is actually younger than Rice. He was used as 3rd down guy and in clutch situations. It's hard to have good numbers in chicago when Cutler is only looking for Marshall (that's before trestman and jeffery).
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Pass.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Well, we signed Joe Morgan. One year deal. That's our sidney Rice.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Really, No Really ?
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Youth and speed in the draft.
|
Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
Quote:
Rice is arguably a top 10 WR in the league when healthy. The problem is, a healthy Sidney Rice is pretty much an oxymoron. I think it's worth the risk though. He won't cost that much, and like others have said, if he doesn't pan out just cut him. It's no biggie. Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to signing Rice and then STILL drafting a WR in the first. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com