New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Saints Considering Sidney Rice (https://blackandgold.com/saints/64912-saints-considering-sidney-rice.html)

dizzle88 03-17-2014 05:41 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Preston Parker outplayed everyone in preseason, at wide receiver and kick returner and still got cut

I wish we had kept him around and used him on returns instead of sproles

bobdog86 03-17-2014 07:04 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Rice can't stay healthy, move on

Danno 03-17-2014 07:09 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bobdog86 (Post 583999)
Rice can't stay healthy, move on

Which is exactly why he's a bargain bin type free agent vet.

If he could stay healthy he'd cost 3 times as much.

Its the kind of player you keep on the phone squad in case you need a guy for 3 or 4 weeks, or to hold the fort until some rookie develops.

We aren't looking at him for anything other than a cheap but talented stop gap vet with some major upside if he can stay healthy.

The Dude 03-17-2014 08:46 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
IMO he would be a nice luxury if we had the money, but he is way too injury prone to bring in just as a luxury.

hagan714 03-17-2014 08:49 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
even at league min i have to say pass. how many games can you get out him before he goes back in the tub

Luda34 03-17-2014 09:19 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Pass he had one good year with Brett with Vikings

rezburna 03-17-2014 09:23 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
I'm glad our fans aren't GM's. Colston and Lance Moore would be here until they're 40. Andy Tanner would be a starter. Jimmy Graham would be getting $17 million a year. The ship would sink so fast. Lol.

billyt81 03-17-2014 09:35 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CheramieIII (Post 583976)
I agree with Marching On. I think we're ok on receivers. backfield will be the same, Oline, tight ends, QB, aren't we still talking to Meach? and then draft a good possession receiver and a straight line speed guy in the later rounds.

???Were good on receiver? Right now our top three receivers are Colston, Stills and Meachem. And you can't get straight line speed guys in the later rounds. Unless they have stone hands and what good is that? Darrius Heyward Bay........

bobdog86 03-17-2014 11:47 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 584000)
Which is exactly why he's a bargain bin type free agent vet.

If he could stay healthy he'd cost 3 times as much.

Its the kind of player you keep on the phone squad in case you need a guy for 3 or 4 weeks, or to hold the fort until some rookie develops.

We aren't looking at him for anything other than a cheap but talented stop gap vet with some major upside if he can stay healthy.

Sorry Danno, too many "If's Here"…"If he can stay healthy" is the point…he can't and hasn't yet. Pass.

nycsaintfan 03-18-2014 12:01 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Rice played a full season in 2012. Did not put up the numbers he did in 09. But if he stays healthy in this offense 70-80 catches with a possible 1000 yard season is not out of the question.

I like the idea of buying low on Rice, and drafting a receiver in round one.

TheOak 03-18-2014 04:04 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by |Mitch| (Post 583912)
Byrd is not one known to really blast receivers when tackling, Vaccaro and Bush on the other hand! :bng:


Pick practice.

jeanpierre 03-18-2014 05:41 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Why sign Rice when we just released Moore?!?

Stills is an ascending player and you have a player in Toon or a probable draft pick who will need those invaluable reps to develop...

We could have signed a better, inexpensive option in Hakeem Nicks to a one year prove it option...

But I geaux back to too many receivers inhibit development by limiting reps...

Believe one of the biggest reasons Colston did so well because he got the reps to develop...

hagan714 03-18-2014 06:04 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeanpierre (Post 584068)
Why sign Rice when we just released Moore?!?

Stills is an ascending player and you have a player in Toon or a probable draft pick who will need those invaluable reps to develop...

We could have signed a better, inexpensive option in Hakeem Nicks to a one year prove it option...

But I geaux back to too many receivers inhibit development by limiting reps...

Believe one of the biggest reasons Colston did so well because he got the reps to develop...

Come on SP always has a soft spot for that home run hitter with all the flash and dash. a game changer that allows SP to go deep into the play book and pull out the cutest neatest plays.

saintsfan1976 03-18-2014 08:01 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Saints considering Rice means Saints don't have a lot of money left to spend.

Crusader 03-18-2014 09:41 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
I like Rice and all but with his injury history I just don't know if he is worth the risk.

Danno 03-18-2014 09:44 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crusader (Post 584102)
I like Rice and all but with his injury history I just don't know if he is worth the risk.

I'm not seeing the risk here. He's likely a vet minimum player with a huge upside.

rezburna 03-18-2014 10:48 AM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 584103)
I'm not seeing the risk here. He's likely a vet minimum player with a huge upside.

Exactly. He'll only take away reps from a younger guy if in fact he looks better then the younger guy. If he doesn't produce, he gets cut. No money loss. No cap hit. I'm pretty sure his contract wouldn't include guaranteed money.

brees84 03-18-2014 01:23 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Bears are expected to release Earl Bennett. (cap casualty) If the price is right...

lee909 03-18-2014 01:33 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Not keen on Bennett at all,if you want to kick the tires on a a vet receiver might as well call Brandon Lloyd.He will be desperate as he never played last year

brees84 03-18-2014 02:37 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Lloyd is 32 and he is done. Bennett is actually younger than Rice. He was used as 3rd down guy and in clutch situations. It's hard to have good numbers in chicago when Cutler is only looking for Marshall (that's before trestman and jeffery).

Crusader 03-18-2014 04:14 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 584103)
I'm not seeing the risk here. He's likely a vet minimum player with a huge upside.

The risk is that he beats out a good younger guy in camp that ends up somewhere else and then he gets injured. I'd rather take a slightly lesser player if he is younger and with a better injury history.

Cruize 03-18-2014 04:20 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Pass.

brees84 03-18-2014 05:17 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Well, we signed Joe Morgan. One year deal. That's our sidney Rice.

QBREES9 03-18-2014 07:00 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Really, No Really ?

Rugby Saint II 03-18-2014 07:35 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Youth and speed in the draft.

SaintLeonard 03-18-2014 07:49 PM

Re: Saints Considering Sidney Rice
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Danno (Post 584103)
I'm not seeing the risk here. He's likely a vet minimum player with a huge upside.

I agree.

Rice is arguably a top 10 WR in the league when healthy. The problem is, a healthy Sidney Rice is pretty much an oxymoron. I think it's worth the risk though. He won't cost that much, and like others have said, if he doesn't pan out just cut him. It's no biggie.

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to signing Rice and then STILL drafting a WR in the first.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com