|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; When you have 60 minutes to win a game, you do what works, and last year the running game wasn't working for the most part. I know some people look at the stats and tend to reverse engineer, "we won ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,039
|
Running Predictability in 2013
When you have 60 minutes to win a game, you do what works, and last year the running game wasn't working for the most part. I know some people look at the stats and tend to reverse engineer, "we won because we ran more"... That isn't exactly the case, we ran more because we were running successfully and it was working which lead to us winning the game.
More running is not the key or necessarily means a win. Chicago - 29 ATT, 64 yards Won Carolina - 17 ATT, 69 yards and Won... then turned around and played them again with 30 ATT, 129 yards and lost. New England - 26 ATT, 131 yards and lost Buffalo - 26 ATT, 77 yards and Won Of our top 5 rushing games we lost 3 Of our top 5 passing games we lost 2 Ive been looking at the player splits for 2013 for months now trying to figure out why we are so predictable and nothing ever stood out. I just looked at the team splits and got smacked in the face with a glaring tell tale on our predictability. This gives you ball location odds: When between our own 1-20 yard line we had a total of 65 rushing ATT When between our 20 and mid field we had 175 rushing ATT When between mid field and the opp 20 we had 151 rushing ATT When between opp 20 and the endzone we had 110 rushing ATT This gives you play probability before the snap: No huddle - 4 rushing ATT Huddle - 449 rushing ATT Shotgun - 62 rushing ATT Under Center - 391 rushing ATT In comparison to Denver another heavy passing team. Ball Location When between our own 1-20 yard line we had a total of 106 rushing ATT When between our 20 and mid field we had 182 rushing ATT When between mid field and the opp 20 we had 148 rushing ATT When between opp 20 and the endzone we had 134 rushing ATT Pre snap No huddle - 217 rushing ATT Huddle - 278 rushing ATT Shotgun - 315 rushing ATT Under Center - 180 rushing ATT So pretend to be a Mike LB on a defense and both teams come to the line on their 15 with no huddle What are the Saints likely to do? What is Denver likely to do? Fairly predictable isn't it? On, both teams come to the line on your 15 with no huddle.. ? Here is the kicker .. New Orleans Saints rushing from the no huddle 9.3 YPC, New Orleans Saints rushing from the shotgun 4.8 YPC. Both higher than Denver. One could reach and say that at the end of the day, field position and huddle give us away. ![]() |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/65223-running-predictability-2013-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-01-2014 10:14 AM | 1 |
The Latest NFL News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-01-2014 09:51 AM | 1 |
Running Predictability in 2013 | This thread | Refback | 04-01-2014 09:32 AM | 31 |