caddieman

No but it is funny that 3 days ago Bush was not that good............and now today........he is damn great? LOL!

ChrisXVI

No... 3 day's ago Bush wasn't good enough to be a starting free safety. We're perfectly content to have him as a back-up. I shouldn't be surprised that a Failclowns fan wouldn't understand that distinction since he apparently wasn't good enough to keep him originally but bringing him back and making him a starter was awesome because he may contain some inside knowledge of Rob Ryan's defense lol.

Jack Vegas

I've been saying all along Bush is a very good player that the Saints needed to keep, and that if we didn't we would regret it. So pffft on you.

And he's not a backup. Anybody that plays 70% of the time is not a backup.

saintfan

|Mitch|

About like you Falcon fans, he was going to be your starter and you were going to have full access to our defensive playbook.

We match and then all a sudden, in most delusional falcon fan minds, Dimitroff was doing it on purpose to make us spend more and the Falcons didn't really want him(even though Dwight Lowery was signed 24 hours later)...

Just like them, you're just mad that we have had the off-season that we've had. We didn't have the cap to tag Graham and we did, we didn't have the cap to improve and we did...

Looks like it was the Falcons who were actually "Dimitroff'd" as they like to say on Falcons Life