![]() |
Triplett trades up
Mike Triplet Trades up from 27-19 grabs Brandon cooks
gives up a 3rd and 6th to move up This was my reaction. MIKE Triplett You Have needs at WR and a Center. How you gonna get both of those filled with Quality players if you trade up? If trade down and you can get them both in the 2nd round. K.Benjamin at say 35 and with our original 2nd can get Marcus martin more than likely or something similar. Just sayin do this The LOOMIS WAY We already have a 5'10" WR in Stills keep that in mind what you guys think I want more Picks in this Draft as Deep as it is not less |
Re: Triplett trades up
Pick a Center in the 2nd, 4th or either 5th?
|
Re: Triplett trades up
No to trade up or down. There is plenty of quality at #27. And more than in the early 2nd or 3rd round. Stay put and help the team.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
There is a chance that Cooks is there at #27. Otherwise, there will be stud CB or LB. Stay put.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
With Gilbert, Shazier ,Fuller still on the board I do not think he was BPA certainly not enough to trade up for
|
Re: Triplett trades up
The offense struggled at times last year and could really do with the explosiveness of somebody like Cooks.We need somebody to scare the living daylights out of teams the way Sproles did two years ago,somebody that can turn a 10 yard quick pass into a 60 yard gain. If the offense moves as slowly as it did at times last year and stalls we are screwed when the chips are down. I like it,we have a good roster so be aggressive and get the players you want,do not make do.With the amount of teams who want to move down its pretty cheap to move up.
Id be happy to trade 1/3/6 for a OBJ,Cooks and then BPA again in the second and fourth and packaging the two 5ths to move into the 4th for the right player and go grab the best UFA again.Four good players is better than 3 good and 4 mediocre/potential |
Re: Triplett trades up
I'd go best player available. If we're talking need, we need offense. Our offense held us back in all the big games.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
Our offense needs the pick in my opinion |
Re: Triplett trades up
I think they should trade Graham for a first and second. Then we would have 1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,and6....I think we could build a team with that:)
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
Please read the 27 trade Graham threads. |
Re: Triplett trades up
Saints have had few draft picks as compared to nfl average.The draft is deep at wr take one at 27th pick or 58th pick or trade down to early 2nd round but do not trade up.Saints need to get younger an cheaper this is how patriots an 49ers have done they averaged almost double the amount of total draft picks as compared to Saints.They need a wr/olb/saftey/a big 3-4 deffensive lineman/a back up left tackle an a lineman who can back up or push letio at the guard-center position along with a scat back running back.That takes 7 picks a trade down to get say 2 more picks to be used on a qb and another wr or other position for depth.Point is Saint need all the picks they can get do not get hung up on a player a trade from 27th to say 19th most likely a 19 th pick not a world class player.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Loomis and Payton are like Viking warriors. They take what they want. If we like a guy enough and he's within (or out of) reach - they'll trade.
I fully expect to see us trade up at least into round 3 |
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
If BPA was a science, most draft boards would look alike. They don't. Your BPA depends a lot on the team and what you want to do with him. |
Re: Triplett trades up
I have no problem with a trade up, especially if its only a 3rd rounder.
Losing that 3rd rounder isn't going to hurt especially if we end up getting a player that we're convinced is special. Quality over quantity. We burned 2 picks to get Jenkins, that worked out well for us. Everyone wants to trade down, especially teams with numerous holes to fill. We aren't a team with numerous holes to fill. It will be cheaper to trade up this year than just about any draft in recent memory. I could also see a lot of position swaps instead of straight up trades... We could give up our 2nd, 3rd, 4th for another teams 3rd, 4th 5th in order to move up in the 1st. We'd still have the same number of picks, just maybe a half-round later. |
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Let's see the most WR loaded draft in the history of the draft and you trade up to get a WR? Yes that makes sense......only if you rode the short bus to and from school.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
He can't be traded. |
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
we are not hurting that bad to make the move.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
I agree with Danno. We don't have enough holes to be trying so hard to fill them. Everybody wants to build a team that has no holes. Impossible. Every team does. Even the super bowl winners.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
I would be like most and only trade up for Watkins. (If at all) he is the only one that i would trade up for, we could still get a impact player at 27. So there is no need to go up. Down yes up no. But thats just me.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Mike Evans would be worth trading up for. Brees would make that boy a star.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
A#1 WR is a prime need it might be the time to roll the dice . Might want to double down and pick two.Maybe even three. Loomis gets what he wants.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
best player available.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
i count maybe 1. as #2 there are what 2 maybe 3? specialty WR / slot another 2 ? pass. pray one maybe 2 QB gets draft in the top 26 then kidnap the best one on the board and hold him for ransom. now that is a better plan in my book as long as it is not a QB named Johnny |
Re: Triplett trades up
Lets look at the holes others post the saints do not have,1st hole at wr a colston ageing-morgan comming off back to back ir-toon could be a bust-is cadet someone to replace sproles skill set-watson age at te position-no backup left tackle byrce an marcel are right tackles now the back up left tackle is a ex arena player.no back up center to push letio-a kicker at end of line age wise hope he has another year-6 big d linemen no depth saints keep 7 at position-only 4 safteys on roster think they keep 5 so need a 5th saftey-you always look to up grade the 5th cb spot that takes up a draft pick-two olb coming off ir no quality depth-is it time to draft a qb yes they like the tulane qb but good to have a late pick to compete with the tulane qb if both look good in camp then cut the vet back up younger an cheaper if not one gos to pt squad till next year. That a lot of HOLES you could use 12 picks two alone at wr to up grade roster an now they have 7 picks. Some wish a trade up that could leave them with 5 picks no TRADE ups we need trade downs- go from 7 to say 9 picks hope for three ufda gems an upgrade roster get younger an cheaper young players also less likely to get hurt but you need enough rookies of top quality to allow this long term up grade of roster.Do not get hung up on one player look at the overall roster depth ::bng::stupid::dunce::eek:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
Do we know that Allen Robinson is a Megatron? Paul Richardson? No, in fact defenses I would say has gotten weaker in the Big 10 which is why I am not high at all on Roby. We need to see how those players will do against NFL competition. Pac 12 has produced NFL talent, so has the big 12, and SEC. ACC sort of has. |
Re: Triplett trades up
I can't imagine any real life scenario where the Saints would trade up for Cooks. I don't even want the guy period. Not because he isn't any good, but because he reminds me of the type of receiver we always seem to find without spending a high draft choice. But trade up for him? I don't think so.
If the Saints are dead set on picking a WR then I think there are more than enough good one's and none of them are clear cut better than the rest (other than MAYBE Watkins) to where there shouldn't be any need to trade up for one. |
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
Honestly, who was the last person the Saints drafted that you knew was going to be drafted before they called his name? There is no logic to apply, its mostly guessing, which is why no one does 1 mock draft and sticks to it. |
Re: Triplett trades up
History shows us that the FO is more than willing to move up in the draft for a player they covet. They rarely move back in the draft but they have been known to do it.
I would definitely not trade away our 3rd round pick because that is where we seem to hit gold. |
Re: Triplett trades up
I think given the history I expect Loomis to not go after Lee or Roby just because of being burned by players from those two schools in the past. I'm expecting Cooks, Ford, or Verret who will be among the BPAs.
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
That's my logic, and I AM sticking to it. All this mock crap gets on my nerves. |
Re: Triplett trades up
we will take the best player available. hopefully a de/olb type or CB. we already have plenty of weapons on offense. will need someone to replace colston and a center
|
Re: Triplett trades up
Quote:
The opposite is also true, ever see a group of emo teenagers all in black with makeup etc? They are all striving to be different, however they just end up creating a new same because they are all sharing the same logic. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com