|
|||||||
Rivers vs. Brees
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; If they franchise Brees they are forced to keep him, b/c no one\'s going to trade the picks and pay him top 5 money. Franchising could be dangerous. But I think that they do have to go to the kid, ...
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-01-2004, 11:42 AM
|
#11 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Rivers vs. Brees
If they franchise Brees they are forced to keep him, b/c no one\'s going to trade the picks and pay him top 5 money. Franchising could be dangerous. But I think that they do have to go to the kid, just like Lewis did in Cincy despite Kitna having a great year the year before. Eventually, you have to make the switch... or trade the number one pick if you think that Brees is the way to go. A transition tag may be better for SD - that way they get something (right?) but they still have the opportunity to move Brees.
|
|
\"Excuses, excuses, excuses. That’s all anyone ever makes for the New Orleans Saints’ organization.\" - Eric Narcisse
\"Being a Saints fan is almost like being addicted to crack,\" he said.[i]\"You know you should stop, but you just can\'t.\" |
|
|
|
12-01-2004, 11:47 AM
|
#12 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Rivers vs. Brees
A transition tag I could see. Not a franchise tag though. That is a huge leap of faith that some team wants him that bad.
|
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 07:29 PM
|
#13 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
|
Rivers vs. Brees
Trust me with premium qb\'s in this league is a need and all you have to do is look at almost half of them and see that. Chicago??? Someone will take it a trade and pay the money. But I still don\'t see it going that way... team chemistry, you don\'t mess with it if its winning.
|
|
|
Linear Mode
