Horn leading the NFL

Danno · 12-14-2004, 04:56 PM

Took the words right out of my mouth WHO. One week Danno says Deuce is bad, and he is playing like crap,

I never said he was bad, I said he wasn\'t playing well.

the next week it is we need to get rid of out best offensive weapon cause he costs too much and so we can sign Deuce to a long term deal.

Never said we should get rid of him. Only that we shouldn\'t overpay for him. There\'s a difference.
I\'ve also stated that Deuce IS our best player, he just needs to step up.

I am a little confused myself. I mean, the man is making $600,000 this year and putting out $6,000,000 worth of effort. Pay him. And he hasn\'t complained once about it, even though he is hurt pretty much every game.

Wouldn\'t hurt my feelings if we did overpay somewhat for him. He\'s earned it. But there\'s no need to twist what I\'ve said. My whole point was every post praised him, then followed with a slanted slam against anyone who points out valid arguements for not paying him a HUGE amount of money. Much like your statements about my position on things.
Would you pay him 200 million? Probably not.
Would you pay him 2 million? Hell YES!

There is a line there that benefits both parties. Where do you draw it?

[Edited on 14/12/2004 by Danno]

12-14-2004, 04:56 PM	#1
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,751	Horn leading the NFL Took the words right out of my mouth WHO. One week Danno says Deuce is bad, and he is playing like crap, I never said he was bad, I said he wasn\'t playing well. the next week it is we need to get rid of out best offensive weapon cause he costs too much and so we can sign Deuce to a long term deal. Never said we should get rid of him. Only that we shouldn\'t overpay for him. There\'s a difference. I\'ve also stated that Deuce IS our best player, he just needs to step up. I am a little confused myself. I mean, the man is making $600,000 this year and putting out $6,000,000 worth of effort. Pay him. And he hasn\'t complained once about it, even though he is hurt pretty much every game. Wouldn\'t hurt my feelings if we did overpay somewhat for him. He\'s earned it. But there\'s no need to twist what I\'ve said. My whole point was every post praised him, then followed with a slanted slam against anyone who points out valid arguements for not paying him a HUGE amount of money. Much like your statements about my position on things. Would you pay him 200 million? Probably not. Would you pay him 2 million? Hell YES! There is a line there that benefits both parties. Where do you draw it? [Edited on 14/12/2004 by Danno]