Tanner's back...again

dizzle88 · 08-28-2014, 08:45 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

I think the conversation has taken a wrong turn. My original comment was directed at Xan claiming he's done nothing to earn that money, which I think is false. Just because he didn't suit up on Sundays doesn't mean he didn't work his ass off all week like the rest of the team did.

The talent ahead of him is what's stopping him being activated, I can't remember who said it but earlier this week someone made a comment which I agreed with.

If a 23 year old lance Moore came into Saints camp this year, he most likely wouldn't make the team or he'd be put on the PS

Lance Moore took advantage of the situation when we only really had colston that had proven himself, tanner isn't so lucky because the first 4 or 5 spots are pretty much set in stone

TheOak · 08-28-2014, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

The talent ahead of him is what's stopping him being activated, I can't remember who said it but earlier this week someone made a comment which I agreed with.

If a 23 year old lance Moore came into Saints camp this year, he most likely wouldn't make the team or he'd be put on the PS

Lance Moore took advantage of the situation when we only really had colston that had proven himself, tanner isn't so lucky because the first 4 or 5 spots are pretty much set in stone

There are a few caveats to consider. If you want to categorize him not playing for the Saints you are correct. If you want to ask why isn't he on an NFL roster? That has to be surmised by lacking something that 32 teams are looking for in a WR to put on their final roster.

Lots of comparing him to Lance Moore... Lance Moore is now on an active roster in Pittsburgh so I wouldn't necessarily say they are equal talents, if they were.... the Steelers could have had Tanner for a lot less than $1.5m/year.

hennr · 08-28-2014, 09:04 AM

One point i not sure of,Saints wavie an players clear waviers then put on IR an then say in a few weeks they get an injury settelment at that point because saints first wavied the player before placeing the player on IR then ? can the player be signed to the active roster.I know normally after a player put on IR hes can not be put on active roster but as the team exposed the player to wavier wire is there an exception,Or is this done so it is easier to cut the player with an iniury settelment or is it so they do not count against the cap.

dizzle88 · 08-28-2014, 09:07 AM

Originally Posted by TheOak

There are a few caveats to consider. If you want to categorize him not playing for the Saints you are correct. If you want to ask why isn't he on an NFL roster? That has to be surmised by lacking something that 32 teams are looking for in a WR to put on their final roster.

Lots of comparing him to Lance Moore... Lance Moore is now on an active roster in Pittsburgh so I wouldn't necessarily say they are equal talents, if they were.... the Steelers could have had Tanner for a lot less than $1.5m/year.

Yeah that's a fair point, I didn't mean to completely compare him to lance Moore, my meaning behind it was they are both talented guys but lance Moore took advantage of his opportunity when we were thin at WR and stuck because he was so effective, which is why I believe he is on the active roster of the Steelers, theyve seen 7 years worth of game time from him with Brees at the helm

Tanner is always in a difficult spot because he has colston, Graham, stills, toon, meachem and now cooks ahead of him

Of course that does beg the question, if tanner deserved a shot somewhere else, why hasnt a team claimed him on the waiver wire?

hennr · 08-28-2014, 09:15 AM

He would not be a starter an he is hurt so why would another team sign him. Now i could see a division rival claim him just to get a inside look at paytons playbook.They could Ir him just to get the info.Tanner is good enough to be a 5th or 6th wr on another team which lacks depth at the position as when healthy he runs good routes has good hands an has a lot of Lnce Moore skill set.

homerj07 · 08-28-2014, 10:53 AM

6000 a week is pretty sweet.

K Major · 08-28-2014, 11:04 AM

Originally Posted by homerj07

6000 a week is pretty sweet.

+1. You definitely won't be making that on a paper route gig.

saintsfan1976 · 08-28-2014, 06:00 PM

I pulled a quad just reading the last page

TheOak · 08-28-2014, 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

I pulled a quad just reading the last page

That's what she said.

SmashMouth · 08-28-2014, 10:11 PM

Originally Posted by homerj07

6000 a week is pretty sweet.

Sit ups?

08-28-2014, 08:45 AM	#21
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,118	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by Danno I think the conversation has taken a wrong turn. My original comment was directed at Xan claiming he's done nothing to earn that money, which I think is false. Just because he didn't suit up on Sundays doesn't mean he didn't work his ass off all week like the rest of the team did. The talent ahead of him is what's stopping him being activated, I can't remember who said it but earlier this week someone made a comment which I agreed with. If a 23 year old lance Moore came into Saints camp this year, he most likely wouldn't make the team or he'd be put on the PS Lance Moore took advantage of the situation when we only really had colston that had proven himself, tanner isn't so lucky because the first 4 or 5 spots are pretty much set in stone

08-28-2014, 09:00 AM	#22
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,019	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by dizzle88 The talent ahead of him is what's stopping him being activated, I can't remember who said it but earlier this week someone made a comment which I agreed with. If a 23 year old lance Moore came into Saints camp this year, he most likely wouldn't make the team or he'd be put on the PS Lance Moore took advantage of the situation when we only really had colston that had proven himself, tanner isn't so lucky because the first 4 or 5 spots are pretty much set in stone There are a few caveats to consider. If you want to categorize him not playing for the Saints you are correct. If you want to ask why isn't he on an NFL roster? That has to be surmised by lacking something that 32 teams are looking for in a WR to put on their final roster. Lots of comparing him to Lance Moore... Lance Moore is now on an active roster in Pittsburgh so I wouldn't necessarily say they are equal talents, if they were.... the Steelers could have had Tanner for a lot less than $1.5m/year. ScottF likes this.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau

08-28-2014, 09:04 AM	#23
hennr 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 262	Re: Tanner's back...again One point i not sure of,Saints wavie an players clear waviers then put on IR an then say in a few weeks they get an injury settelment at that point because saints first wavied the player before placeing the player on IR then ? can the player be signed to the active roster.I know normally after a player put on IR hes can not be put on active roster but as the team exposed the player to wavier wire is there an exception,Or is this done so it is easier to cut the player with an iniury settelment or is it so they do not count against the cap.
hennr 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 262

08-28-2014, 09:07 AM	#24
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,118	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by TheOak There are a few caveats to consider. If you want to categorize him not playing for the Saints you are correct. If you want to ask why isn't he on an NFL roster? That has to be surmised by lacking something that 32 teams are looking for in a WR to put on their final roster. Lots of comparing him to Lance Moore... Lance Moore is now on an active roster in Pittsburgh so I wouldn't necessarily say they are equal talents, if they were.... the Steelers could have had Tanner for a lot less than $1.5m/year. Yeah that's a fair point, I didn't mean to completely compare him to lance Moore, my meaning behind it was they are both talented guys but lance Moore took advantage of his opportunity when we were thin at WR and stuck because he was so effective, which is why I believe he is on the active roster of the Steelers, theyve seen 7 years worth of game time from him with Brees at the helm Tanner is always in a difficult spot because he has colston, Graham, stills, toon, meachem and now cooks ahead of him Of course that does beg the question, if tanner deserved a shot somewhere else, why hasnt a team claimed him on the waiver wire?
	Your bonehead creator picked a fine chapter to omit from your memory bank....let me ask you, does a machine like yourself ever experience fear? - Vegeta, DBZ

08-28-2014, 09:15 AM	#25
hennr 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 262	Re: Tanner's back...again He would not be a starter an he is hurt so why would another team sign him. Now i could see a division rival claim him just to get a inside look at paytons playbook.They could Ir him just to get the info.Tanner is good enough to be a 5th or 6th wr on another team which lacks depth at the position as when healthy he runs good routes has good hands an has a lot of Lnce Moore skill set.
hennr 100th Post Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 262

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

08-28-2014, 10:53 AM	#26
homerj07 In Doh We Trust Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Central Florida Posts: 7,027 Blog Entries: 16	Re: Tanner's back...again 6000 a week is pretty sweet.

08-28-2014, 11:04 AM	#27
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,588 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by homerj07 6000 a week is pretty sweet. +1. You definitely won't be making that on a paper route gig.

08-28-2014, 06:00 PM	#28
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,806 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Tanner's back...again I pulled a quad just reading the last page TheOak likes this.

08-28-2014, 06:49 PM	#29
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,019	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 I pulled a quad just reading the last page That's what she said.

08-28-2014, 10:11 PM	#30
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,044 Blog Entries: 29	Re: Tanner's back...again Originally Posted by homerj07 6000 a week is pretty sweet. Sit ups?

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/67696-tanners-back-again.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest Andy Tanner News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-31-2014 11:15 AM	2
The Latest Ty Zimmerman News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-27-2014 04:34 PM	6
Tanner's back...again	This thread	Refback	08-27-2014 11:14 AM	8
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-27-2014 11:09 AM	4