Position Spotlight: RB

Utah_Saint · 10-15-2014, 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

I would not be against trading Ingram to Philly. We might get a 5th rounder for him now that Sproles went down. We haven't missed a beat without him in the line up. I don't remember who we placed on PS. I'm thinking there was a RB. Flanders maybe.

From what I've read, the Sproles injury is very minor. The Eagles have a bye this week and they think Sproles will be back after the bye. He may not even miss a game.

hagan714 · 10-16-2014, 06:27 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

No, the reason Ingram's option wasn't exercised is because market value for RB's doesn't warrant it.

you really think that is the only reason? I don't. injuries and blah blah blah we have beaten this horse to death. system or what ever Ingram is not and never has proven he was worth the price we paid for him. If he became the back we thought we were getting when we drafted him he would be signed today

Originally Posted by hagan714

pretty much spot on. that is why Ingram was not extended IMO. he has for various reasons and most are justified not taken a firm grip on the #1 RB position.

I expect the saints to try to sign him and i am cool with it. But on the priority list i do not see him having a very high ranking. every year a udfa is pushing him for playing time

10-15-2014, 05:51 PM	#11
Utah_Saint Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Posts: 3,521	Re: Position Spotlight: RB Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II I would not be against trading Ingram to Philly. We might get a 5th rounder for him now that Sproles went down. We haven't missed a beat without him in the line up. I don't remember who we placed on PS. I'm thinking there was a RB. Flanders maybe. From what I've read, the Sproles injury is very minor. The Eagles have a bye this week and they think Sproles will be back after the bye. He may not even miss a game.

10-16-2014, 06:27 AM	#12
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Position Spotlight: RB Originally Posted by Danno No, the reason Ingram's option wasn't exercised is because market value for RB's doesn't warrant it. you really think that is the only reason? I don't. injuries and blah blah blah we have beaten this horse to death. system or what ever Ingram is not and never has proven he was worth the price we paid for him. If he became the back we thought we were getting when we drafted him he would be signed today Originally Posted by hagan714 pretty much spot on. that is why Ingram was not extended IMO. he has for various reasons and most are justified not taken a firm grip on the #1 RB position. I expect the saints to try to sign him and i am cool with it. But on the priority list i do not see him having a very high ranking. every year a udfa is pushing him for playing time
	"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins Last edited by hagan714; 10-16-2014 at 06:30 AM..

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/68808-position-spotlight-rb.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest Darren Sproles News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-14-2014 06:10 PM	1
Position Spotlight: RB	This thread	Refback	10-14-2014 11:11 AM	2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-14-2014 10:49 AM	1

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey