2000 season question.

FWtex · 01-08-2003, 12:04 AM

I am trying to remember how that season went regarding early season wins, or a slump. I know Brooks came in after Blake was hurt but I am trying to remember if they started the season hot like the last two years.

I am curious if the injury to Blake may have prevented a late season slide that year because the team was forced to make changes and focus more with a "new, inexperienced" QB. Had Blake not been hurt would the team had suffered a late season losing streak. Were they starting to falter some before Blake was hurt?

I know we'll never know but it does'nt it make you wonder somewhat? Maybe HAZ should revisit the 2000 season for some indications and answers.

PSno23 · 01-08-2003, 04:06 AM

2000 is over with. Not much we can do about that, nor say about it. All we can look toward is the future. Maybe some answers lie in that season, but still, we cannot reflect on what could have happened in the past. Let\'s look to the future. GEAUX SAINTS!!!

WhoDat · 01-08-2003, 12:19 PM

They were slightly above average before Blake\'s injury. I think they went 3-5 in their last eight, but don\'t quote me on that one. 2-2 in the last four I\'m pretty sure of. That makes Haslett\'s teams 3-9 in the last month of regular seasons.

ScottBalot · 01-08-2003, 07:20 PM

The Saints went 5-3 in their last 8 games in 2000, 2-2 in December. Aaron Brooks was 3-2 as a starter once Blake went down, and of course 1-1 in the playoffs.

WhoDat · 01-08-2003, 07:22 PM

Well hell, at least I had the numbes right... I meant 5-3.

01-08-2003, 12:04 AM	#1
FWtex 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 370	2000 season question. I am trying to remember how that season went regarding early season wins, or a slump. I know Brooks came in after Blake was hurt but I am trying to remember if they started the season hot like the last two years. I am curious if the injury to Blake may have prevented a late season slide that year because the team was forced to make changes and focus more with a "new, inexperienced" QB. Had Blake not been hurt would the team had suffered a late season losing streak. Were they starting to falter some before Blake was hurt? I know we'll never know but it does'nt it make you wonder somewhat? Maybe HAZ should revisit the 2000 season for some indications and answers.
FWtex 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 370

01-08-2003, 04:06 AM	#2
PSno23 Registered Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New Orleans, LA Posts: 32	2000 season question. 2000 is over with. Not much we can do about that, nor say about it. All we can look toward is the future. Maybe some answers lie in that season, but still, we cannot reflect on what could have happened in the past. Let\'s look to the future. GEAUX SAINTS!!!

01-08-2003, 12:19 PM	#3
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	2000 season question. They were slightly above average before Blake\'s injury. I think they went 3-5 in their last eight, but don\'t quote me on that one. 2-2 in the last four I\'m pretty sure of. That makes Haslett\'s teams 3-9 in the last month of regular seasons.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

01-08-2003, 07:20 PM	#4
ScottBalot Registered Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 87	2000 season question. The Saints went 5-3 in their last 8 games in 2000, 2-2 in December. Aaron Brooks was 3-2 as a starter once Blake went down, and of course 1-1 in the playoffs.
ScottBalot Registered Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 87

01-08-2003, 07:22 PM	#5
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631	2000 season question. Well hell, at least I had the numbes right... I meant 5-3.
WhoDat 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 5,631

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey