Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Are the young bloods on d really better?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by SmashMouth Pierre looked too talented in preseason, yet he did not make the final roster as he should have. What happened there? If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't ...

Like Tree43Likes

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-16-2014, 03:55 PM   #4
100th Post
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 387
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
Pierre looked too talented in preseason, yet he did not make the final roster as he should have. What happened there?
If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't select for even the practice squad a player who so obviously flashed in pre-season that he was a favorite. A big miss. Underscored by a future need to sign him off the Vikes' PS....and then START him.
VegasSaint9 likes this.
MarchingOn is offline  
 


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70106-young-bloods-d-really-better.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Are the young bloods on d really better? This thread Refback 12-16-2014 09:35 AM 2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-16-2014 05:55 AM 6


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts