Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Are the young bloods on d really better?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Our defense normally makes a bad QB look stellar... Last night was a different story. They look competitive and the offense controlled the clock...

Like Tree43Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2014, 08:16 AM   #11
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,583
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Our defense normally makes a bad QB look stellar...
Last night was a different story. They look competitive and the offense controlled the clock
hagan714 and K Major like this.
Jamessr is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 12:13 PM   #12
Resident antediluvian
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,026
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

All through the game I kept asking myself if we were playing good or if the Bears and Cutler were just that bad. But I kept noticing the hustle by players, chasing down plays, fighting to shed blocks and just winning one on one match ups. That has been missing so much on our defense this year.

I fully agree if we play with that same effort and heart at home versus Atlanta they don't stand a chance. But with how inconsistent we are week to week it is shaky confidence. I really want it to continue though.
MarchingOn and captainshawn like this.
lumm0x is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 02:46 PM   #13
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,052
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

The young bloods are at least showing signs of fire.
spkb25, hagan714 and captainshawn like this.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 02:49 PM   #14
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

It was a good game for them to start and get some playing time vs an ailing O.

That Fredrick guy was a good one.

I love the idea... look if you don't do your job we will put someone else in your spot.
Euphoria is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 03:15 PM   #15
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 360
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

We could just play two-high with him and warren leaving kenny to play a hybrid role next year.
ChrisXVI likes this.
VegasSaint9 is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 03:15 PM   #16
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 360
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Kasim edebali has the hustle that junior doesnt have
VegasSaint9 is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 04:53 PM   #17
100th Post
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 387
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Originally Posted by halloween 65 View Post
Players that stood out on the D last night Warren(Byrds back-up for sure now)P-Rob(held down the fort)Ediboli(good showing) Hawthorn(yes Hawthorn) and J, Jenkins( glimpse of hopefully more to come. Warren was all over last night he has great hands and looks to be a good fit at FS but as much as I like him I still feel Byrd will win the starting job but that is 1 position that should be good for years to come. Warren is a better FS than Bush is.
Yeah, "Hawthorne"! Who woulda thought? I'm deciding if I should reconsider wanting him cut. Did our DC just figure out a better way to use him (blitz)?

Loved the idea of trying out Humber as OLB. Trying something finally, at least.

Our secondary had 3 starters who weren't even on the team 3 weeks or so ago?
MarchingOn is offline  
Old 12-16-2014, 04:55 PM   #18
100th Post
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 387
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
Pierre looked too talented in preseason, yet he did not make the final roster as he should have. What happened there?
If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't select for even the practice squad a player who so obviously flashed in pre-season that he was a favorite. A big miss. Underscored by a future need to sign him off the Vikes' PS....and then START him.
VegasSaint9 likes this.
MarchingOn is offline  
Old 12-17-2014, 11:50 AM   #19
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,097
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Originally Posted by MarchingOn View Post
If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't select for even the practice squad a player who so obviously flashed in pre-season that he was a favorite. A big miss. Underscored by a future need to sign him off the Vikes' PS....and then START him.

Didn't the vikes sign him off our practice squad?
spkb25 is offline  
Old 12-17-2014, 12:01 PM   #20
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
Re: Are the young bloods on d really better?

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI View Post
I loved what I saw but I have to control my enthusiasm a little... The Bears were a complete disgrace last night and quit very early in the game. The real test will come next week against the Failclowns. With that being said, I think we know one thing for sure: Pierre Warren is too talented to be on the bench next season. I know Byrd will be back but this kid is a natural who needs to be on the field.
Originally Posted by VegasSaint9 View Post
We could just play two-high with him and warren leaving kenny to play a hybrid role next year.
Agree about Warren but who do you bench Bush or Vaccaro? We have room for 3 safety sets but not 4, and I think Bush is better than Vaccaro at just about everything. Maybe we should trade Vaccaro while he still has some value.
blackangold is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70106-young-bloods-d-really-better.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Are the young bloods on d really better? This thread Refback 12-16-2014 10:35 AM 2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-16-2014 06:55 AM 6


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts