Are the young bloods on d really better?

		New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints
Are the young bloods on d really better?

Are the young bloods on d really better?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by MarchingOn If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't select for even the practice squad a player who so obviously flashed in pre-season that he was a favorite. A big ...

43Likes

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display Modes

12-17-2014, 10:50 AM	#5
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,145	Re: Are the young bloods on d really better? Originally Posted by MarchingOn If Payton and Loomis really want to "fix" things, they'd better re-examine how they didn't select for even the practice squad a player who so obviously flashed in pre-season that he was a favorite. A big miss. Underscored by a future need to sign him off the Vikes' PS....and then START him. Didn't the vikes sign him off our practice squad?

« We will do to the Falcons | 2013 Saints »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70106-young-bloods-d-really-better.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Are the young bloods on d really better?	This thread	Refback	12-16-2014 09:35 AM	2
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-16-2014 05:55 AM	6

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.