![]() |
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Quote:
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
thought his model GF scratched his itches now?
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Is everyone so happy about that tampa win in the last game of the season now? lol
Could have had #7, not to mention better picks in every round. First 3 picks #7 #31 #39 Now we are just hoping some teams drop the ball ahead of us so a top player falls. It's more likely that we package the 31 and 13 to get into the top 5, but we wouldn't have had to do these things if we played our bench in week 17. It also would have been nice to see SJB and Powell get some playing time, what a ****ing dumb move that was. |
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
no matter how meaningless, I'm happy the Saints won instead of folding like TB did so they could get the #1 pick.
Some stupid team is going to draft a QB or someone else higher than they should and some talent will fall to 13 if the Saints don't trade up first |
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
"Hoping" teams draft poorly??
I don't think that after consecutive decades of proof we can still call it "hoping"... more like "guaranteed"... |
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Quote:
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
I think you take the best player available regardless of position needs. Drafting for need gets you Stanley Jean Baptiste when Jarvis Landry(84 rookie catches from Tanneyhill!) was available.
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Quote:
You act like its the fans fault we won the game.:rolleyes: |
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Quote:
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Quote:
Chicago and Atlanta are also building 3-4 defenses so their not going to want to give up the same players that we're probably targeting for our 3-4 defense... Raiders run a 4-3 and the Jets run a hybrid, but have more success with the 4-3 front as well... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com