|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Yeah I agree its going to get really interesting at 7 and 8. I wouldn't even be surprised if the Saints just up there at the last minute....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#3 |
100th Post
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,149
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
If we don't scratch Payton's itch to move up there should be very good players available at a position of need at 13 and 31.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
12,000 BS Posts
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Hou Saints Fan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
thought his model GF scratched his itches now?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,422
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Is everyone so happy about that tampa win in the last game of the season now? lol
Could have had #7, not to mention better picks in every round. First 3 picks #7 #31 #39 Now we are just hoping some teams drop the ball ahead of us so a top player falls. It's more likely that we package the 31 and 13 to get into the top 5, but we wouldn't have had to do these things if we played our bench in week 17. It also would have been nice to see SJB and Powell get some playing time, what a ****ing dumb move that was. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Originally Posted by blackangold
I don't think anyone was "HAPPY", but players aren't gonna play to lose no matter what you think. I don't want losers on my team.![]()
You act like its the fans fault we won the game. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,634
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Originally Posted by blackangold
You do realize that we could have sat key players and still won the game? Especially if Tampa planned to tank anyway.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Re: POSITION RANKINGS
Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo
True, Tampa could simply have tanked more than us regardless.![]()
And what do you think Goodell would have done to us if it was completely obvious that we tried to tank the game. To be honest, I think a team should move to the back of the line if it was blatantly obvious that they had tanked. If we had tried to tank... welcome to the 32nd pick of every round, and I would applaud it. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/72010-position-rankings.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
POSITION RANKINGS | This thread | Refback | 04-17-2015 04:05 PM | 5 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 04-17-2015 03:01 PM | 5 |