![]() |
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Quote:
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
You brought up some good points Gumbo
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Quote:
Given the rate at which 1st round QBs succeed, we are roughly 30% likely to get a bust (think Rick Mirer, Akili Smith, etc.). Furthermore, even if we get a guy who will be better than Brooks, my analysis in another thread (which I won\'t repeat here), demonstrates that statistically speaking our new guy will be worse than Brooks for the next two seasons. I understand the intangibles arguments and that people are tired of Brooks stuff, but, again statistically speaking, you guys are betting on a horse that is both unproven and overwhelming likely to not be good for a couple of years. I\'d like to see more consideration of proven QBs - like Brees - rather than this speculation (unfounded statistically) that a rookie could make it happen for us. There just isn\'t reason to believe that (unless a MUCH MORE detailed argument for particular rookies is given - which it hasn\'t). [Edited on 31/1/2005 by JKool] |
To all Brooks' Bashers.
PS - Scotty, I like the new avatar.
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Quote:
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Should I start the chant?
Bust... Bust... Bust... Do it, BMG, do it. (Double entendre intended.) |
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Quote:
Thanks JK. I know you weren\'t fishing for compliments, but I have to say you are making some highly intelligent points on this thread. No way I could tackle it that well. You\'re doing the \"Militant Moderates\" proud. (Sounds better than \"The Fencers\") |
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Scotty, I\'m not sure how we ended up on a team, but I\'ll take it. My sunshiner days have passed, but I did enjoy them. However, those moonshiner types scare me a bit - I think they party a lot... ;)
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Aaawww, you didn\'t like the Fencers? :P
|
To all Brooks' Bashers.
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com