|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; By now I'm sure everyone knows who Willy Robinson is. I'm kind of perplexed about his job, though. Our defense has been horrible for the last few years and finished dead last this year. I know of no other team ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-01-2005, 01:22 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Willie Robinson
By now I'm sure everyone knows who Willy Robinson is.
I'm kind of perplexed about his job, though. Our defense has been horrible for the last few years and finished dead last this year. I know of no other team thatwould have kept Rick Venturi. Heck, on principle alone, Venturi should have been fired. Now Haslett has created a "new" coaching position on the team. I forget the name he created for it. But, Haslett says Willie is going to assist Venturi and be involved in every game plan... Look, if Venturi needs so much help, then why keep him? Why don't we do the same thing for our offense? That doesn't make much sense does it. The only "logical" conclusion that I can come to is this: 1. Venturi is really no longer the coordinator and Haslett is just saving Venturi from public humiliation. 2. Venturi is still the DC and Haslett just wants to pasify the fans by making them think he's made a change. Thoughts? |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
02-01-2005, 01:26 PM | #2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA (ugh, the food here)
Posts: 1,704
|
Willie Robinson
Venturi is Banson\'s Baby. Haslet was forced to promote him to DC and cannot fire him now. Haslet officially has the power to fire him, but he\'s in no position to fire BB because he\'s deserving of being fired himself. Thus, Haslet must mantain Venturi on the staff, but recognizing he needs help brought in someone to be the actual coordinator.
|
02-01-2005, 01:51 PM | #3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Willie Robinson
I agree. I have to wonder how much Haslett\'s hands are tied. I cannot think of a single scenario in which any other team would have kept Venturi after the season the Saints had - especially since defense has been the offseason focus for 3 years now. Hopefully, whoever was calling the plays at the end of the year keeps calling \'em.
|
02-01-2005, 01:54 PM | #4 |
Cold as Ice!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Big Easy
Posts: 2,978
|
Willie Robinson
|
02-01-2005, 02:02 PM | #5 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 954
|
Willie Robinson
i\'d go with opinion number 1. but i really have no clue what\'s going on in haslett\'s mind or bensons or anyone in the saint\'s organization.
|
02-01-2005, 03:22 PM | #6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
Willie Robinson
you might be glad you don\'t either baron. that could hurt somebody.
|
02-01-2005, 06:51 PM | #7 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,093
|
Willie Robinson
ventrui has been terrible and was not running the d by end of the year. to me that is obvious. for some reason the guy is allowed to stay regardless of how terrible his defensive numbers have been. hopefully he is being replaced by the new guy and they just arent saying that. i would like that
|
02-02-2005, 12:46 AM | #8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
Willie Robinson
it sounds like a great football name if nothing else... willie robbison, uh huh. now say venturi. he should be on the left coast somewhere. hehe
|
02-02-2005, 06:26 AM | #9 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,713
|
Willie Robinson
I don\'t know about this Will Robinson.
I sense Danger. |
02-02-2005, 08:14 AM | #10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 2,540
|
Willie Robinson
lol r u that old danno or do ya just know tv trivia? not the \'90s movie i hope.
anyone know his middle name? |