If this is true,

saintswhodi · 02-01-2005, 03:42 PM

and Donald Driver actually knows what he is talking about, could we ship AB back for their first and J.T.?

http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/s...79/detail.html

Before the boo brids come out J.T. would nto be the starter, but getting an extra first may allow us to deal for Brees.

LKelley67 · 02-01-2005, 04:43 PM

sounds good to me.

the more i have thought about brees the more i believe a) they will franchise him, let him start, and put off a decision on rivers and him until next year. or b) realize they are in a position to really go for it now and trade rivers. they could get another 1st rounder or high quality player they need with the two 1st rounders they already have. that is a lot of flexibility and firepower for a division winner.

the green bay connection... their first and let grady jackson come back (nothing but good since there).

i dunno the leon n daddy connection is my fave- ab for pick #33 and rattay. let rogers learn from a master.

saintswhodi · 02-01-2005, 04:50 PM

Dunno about Grady coming back, He may have harsh feelings and get lazy again. Also, we can draft Travis Johnson or someone had a good article on Hawthorne\'s work ethic on here. Maybe him.

Are you saying we should trade AB for Rattay and their second? I will have to think about that. Doesn\'t seem too terrible as Rattay played well when Garcia got hurt a year ago. He has to be making a lower salary as well. So we would have the first pick of the 2nd round to go with # 16 and # 40. I like that too, though I would rather go for Brees by fleecing Green Bay\'s first. But not a bad idea on your end either. Get another second for Howard(maybe). So we would have brees or Rattay, and a combo of two first and two seconds, or one first and three seconds. Not too shabby.

TheJudge · 02-01-2005, 05:16 PM

hell, i would not mind seeing rattay.... he is a good QB.. so long as he has the time to throw it....

least hed be fun to watch

saintswhodi · 02-01-2005, 05:48 PM

I wouldn\'t mind Rattay either, as long we drafted a rookie to to groon to take over.

LKelley67 · 02-01-2005, 06:00 PM

rattay, two 1sts, and two 2nds... now that\'s a nipple hardener- a qb to develop under rattay, 2 defensive studs, and a top ot (in no particular order).

saintswhodi · 02-01-2005, 06:05 PM

That would be as if I was playig Madden, though I would get a better QB than Rattay if it was Madden, and usually I do.

papz · 02-01-2005, 06:33 PM

I would rather Rattay then Brooks, Rattay makes better decisions.

spkb25 · 02-01-2005, 07:26 PM

well i wouldnt like rattay rather then brooks myself. now i wouldnt mind jt coming back in that sort of trade but i wouldnt expect it. i think we have to keep brroks for at least one more season. i dont know how we have an option there. we dont have anyone that can replace him. but we need to pick a qb up in the draft. one that can be groomed to take over for brooks in a year. just my thoughts. but if we could trade brooks for a first or second rounder and pick up warner an draft a qb i think that would be nice. keep warner for a year and then let the kid take over

baronm · 02-02-2005, 09:58 AM

AB for Rattay and their second

we could easily get frye with that pick.

I would like green bay\'s first rounder though..butr I think a high second will be just as good: defense in the first, qb then defense or line in the second.

02-01-2005, 03:42 PM	#1
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	If this is true, and Donald Driver actually knows what he is talking about, could we ship AB back for their first and J.T.? http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/s...79/detail.html Before the boo brids come out J.T. would nto be the starter, but getting an extra first may allow us to deal for Brees.

02-01-2005, 04:43 PM	#2
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	If this is true, sounds good to me. the more i have thought about brees the more i believe a) they will franchise him, let him start, and put off a decision on rivers and him until next year. or b) realize they are in a position to really go for it now and trade rivers. they could get another 1st rounder or high quality player they need with the two 1st rounders they already have. that is a lot of flexibility and firepower for a division winner. the green bay connection... their first and let grady jackson come back (nothing but good since there). i dunno the leon n daddy connection is my fave- ab for pick #33 and rattay. let rogers learn from a master.

02-01-2005, 05:16 PM	#4
TheJudge 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 100	If this is true, hell, i would not mind seeing rattay.... he is a good QB.. so long as he has the time to throw it.... least hed be fun to watch
TheJudge 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 100

02-01-2005, 05:48 PM	#5
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	If this is true, I wouldn\'t mind Rattay either, as long we drafted a rookie to to groon to take over.

02-01-2005, 06:00 PM	#6
LKelley67 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: baton rouge Posts: 2,540	If this is true, rattay, two 1sts, and two 2nds... now that\'s a nipple hardener- a qb to develop under rattay, 2 defensive studs, and a top ot (in no particular order).

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

02-01-2005, 04:50 PM	#3
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	If this is true, Dunno about Grady coming back, He may have harsh feelings and get lazy again. Also, we can draft Travis Johnson or someone had a good article on Hawthorne\'s work ethic on here. Maybe him. Are you saying we should trade AB for Rattay and their second? I will have to think about that. Doesn\'t seem too terrible as Rattay played well when Garcia got hurt a year ago. He has to be making a lower salary as well. So we would have the first pick of the 2nd round to go with # 16 and # 40. I like that too, though I would rather go for Brees by fleecing Green Bay\'s first. But not a bad idea on your end either. Get another second for Howard(maybe). So we would have brees or Rattay, and a combo of two first and two seconds, or one first and three seconds. Not too shabby.

02-01-2005, 06:05 PM	#7
saintswhodi 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: San Antonio, TX Posts: 6,941	If this is true, That would be as if I was playig Madden, though I would get a better QB than Rattay if it was Madden, and usually I do.

02-01-2005, 06:33 PM	#8
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,755	If this is true, I would rather Rattay then Brooks, Rattay makes better decisions.

02-01-2005, 07:26 PM	#9
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,101	If this is true, well i wouldnt like rattay rather then brooks myself. now i wouldnt mind jt coming back in that sort of trade but i wouldnt expect it. i think we have to keep brroks for at least one more season. i dont know how we have an option there. we dont have anyone that can replace him. but we need to pick a qb up in the draft. one that can be groomed to take over for brooks in a year. just my thoughts. but if we could trade brooks for a first or second rounder and pick up warner an draft a qb i think that would be nice. keep warner for a year and then let the kid take over
	Your team stinks

02-02-2005, 09:58 AM	#10
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954	If this is true, AB for Rattay and their second we could easily get frye with that pick. I would like green bay\'s first rounder though..butr I think a high second will be just as good: defense in the first, qb then defense or line in the second.
baronm 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 954